
Radeon RX Vega M GL vs GeForce GTX 965M SLI

Radeon RX Vega M GL
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 965M SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is positioned at rank 208 and the GeForce GTX 965M SLI is on rank 205, so the GeForce GTX 965M SLI offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX Vega M GL
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 965M SLI
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega M GL uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX Vega M GL likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 965M SLI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega M GL.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GeForce GTX 965M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 965M SLI remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega M GL and GeForce GTX 965M SLI

Radeon RX Vega M GL
The Radeon RX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,906 points.

GeForce GTX 965M SLI
The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,010 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX Vega M GL scores 3,906 and the GeForce GTX 965M SLI reaches 4,010 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce GTX 965M SLI uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 2,048 (GeForce GTX 965M SLI). Boost clocks: 1011 MHz vs 950 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GeForce GTX 965M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,906 | 4,010+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2048+60% |
| Boost Clock | 1011 MHz+6% | 950 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GeForce GTX 965M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX Vega M GL comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 965M SLI has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 965M SLI offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 179.2 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 80.2 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX 965M SLI) — a 123.4% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega M GL. Bus width: 1024-bit vs 128-bit x2.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GeForce GTX 965M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s+123% | 80.2 GB/s x2 |
| Bus Width | 1024-bit+700% | 128-bit x2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX Vega M GL draws 65W versus the GeForce GTX 965M SLI's 75W — a 14.3% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 965M SLI). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GeForce GTX 965M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-13% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 60.1+12% | 53.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX Vega M GL is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GeForce GTX 965M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | — |
| Codename | Polaris 22 | — |
| Release | February 1 2018 | January 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #500 | #370 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















