
Radeon RX Vega M GL vs GRID P6-2Q

Radeon RX Vega M GL
Popular choices:

GRID P6-2Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is positioned at rank 208 and the GRID P6-2Q is on rank 296, so the Radeon RX Vega M GL offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX Vega M GL
Performance Per Dollar GRID P6-2Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega M GL uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX Vega M GL likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID P6-2Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P6-2Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega M GL.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID P6-2Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $150 (vs $150), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 0.5% better value per dollar than the Radeon RX Vega M GL.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega M GL and GRID P6-2Q

Radeon RX Vega M GL
The Radeon RX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,906 points.

GRID P6-2Q
The GRID P6-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,926 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX Vega M GL scores 3,906 and the GRID P6-2Q reaches 3,926 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is built on GCN 4.0 while the GRID P6-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 2,048 (GRID P6-2Q). Raw compute: 2.588 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P6-2Q). Boost clocks: 1011 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,906 | 3,926 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2048+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.588 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+86% |
| Boost Clock | 1011 MHz | 1178 MHz+17% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 768 KB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX Vega M GL comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GRID P6-2Q has 2 GB. The GRID P6-2Q offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 1024-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 2 MB (GRID P6-2Q) — the GRID P6-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 1024-bit+1500% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 12 (12_1) (GRID P6-2Q). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs NVENC 4 (GRID P6-2Q). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs NVDEC 3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs H.264,H.265 (GRID P6-2Q).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | NVENC 4 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | NVDEC 3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX Vega M GL draws 65W versus the GRID P6-2Q's 225W — a 110.3% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 350W (GRID P6-2Q). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-71% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 60.1+245% | 17.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX Vega M GL launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GRID P6-2Q launched at $2000 and now averages $150. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 26.2 (GRID P6-2Q) — the GRID P6-2Q offers 0.8% better value. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-93% | $2000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.0 | 26.2 |
| Codename | Polaris 22 | GM204 |
| Release | February 1 2018 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #500 | #433 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















