Radeon RX Vega M GL vs GRID M60-8Q
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Popular choices:
GRID M60-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is positioned at rank #208 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX Vega M GL
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega M GL uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX Vega M GL likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID M60-8Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX Vega M GL is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GRID M60-8Q offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GRID M60-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX Vega M GL offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $500 for the GRID M60-8Q, it costs 70% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 235.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GRID M60-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+235.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($150) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega M GL and GRID M60-8Q
Radeon RX Vega M GL
The Radeon RX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,906 points.
GRID M60-8Q
The GRID M60-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,884 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX Vega M GL scores 3,906 and the GRID M60-8Q reaches 3,884 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is built on GCN 4.0 while the GRID M60-8Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-8Q). Raw compute: 2.588 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-8Q). Boost clocks: 1011 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GRID M60-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,906 | 3,884 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2048+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.588 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+86% |
| Boost Clock | 1011 MHz | 1178 MHz+17% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 768 KB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GRID M60-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX Vega M GL comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GRID M60-8Q has 2 GB. The GRID M60-8Q offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 1024-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-8Q) — the GRID M60-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GRID M60-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 1024-bit+1500% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX Vega M GL draws 65W versus the GRID M60-8Q's 225W — a 110.3% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 350W (GRID M60-8Q). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GRID M60-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-71% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 60.1+247% | 17.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX Vega M GL launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GRID M60-8Q launched at $0 and now averages $500. The Radeon RX Vega M GL costs 70% less ($350 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 7.8 (GRID M60-8Q) — the Radeon RX Vega M GL offers 233.3% better value. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GRID M60-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-70% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.0+233% | 7.8 |
| Codename | Polaris 22 | GM204 |
| Release | February 1 2018 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #500 | #505 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX Vega M GL and GRID M60-8Q
