Radeon RX590 GME vs Quadro P3200
Radeon RX590 GME
Popular choices:
Quadro P3200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX590 GME
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P3200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX590 GME offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX590 GME | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P3200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $63 versus $115 for the Radeon RX590 GME, it costs 45% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 87.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX590 GME | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+87.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($115) | ✅More affordable ($63) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX590 GME and Quadro P3200
Radeon RX590 GME
The Radeon RX590 GME is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 15 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1469 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,349 points. Launch price was $279.
Quadro P3200
The Quadro P3200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1328 MHz to 1543 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,578 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX590 GME scores 8,349 and the Quadro P3200 reaches 8,578 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX590 GME is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro P3200 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX590 GME) vs 1,792 (Quadro P3200). Raw compute: 7.119 TFLOPS (Radeon RX590 GME) vs 5.53 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200). Boost clocks: 1545 MHz vs 1543 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX590 GME | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,349 | 8,578+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+29% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.119 TFLOPS+29% | 5.53 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1545 MHz | 1543 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 144+29% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB | 672 KB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX590 GME | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX590 GME comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P3200 has 4 GB. The Radeon RX590 GME offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX590 GME) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200) — the Radeon RX590 GME has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX590 GME | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon RX590 GME) vs 12 (Quadro P3200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX590 GME | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX590 GME) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P3200). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX590 GME) vs H.265,H.264 (Quadro P3200).
| Feature | Radeon RX590 GME | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | NVDEC 3rd Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.265,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX590 GME draws 175W versus the Quadro P3200's 75W — a 80% difference. The Quadro P3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX590 GME) vs 500W (Quadro P3200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.
| Feature | Radeon RX590 GME | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W | 75W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 47.7 | 114.4+140% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX590 GME launched at $173 MSRP and currently averages $115, while the Quadro P3200 launched at $500 and now averages $63. The Quadro P3200 costs 45.2% less ($52 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 72.6 (Radeon RX590 GME) vs 136.2 (Quadro P3200) — the Quadro P3200 offers 87.6% better value.
| Feature | Radeon RX590 GME | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $173-65% | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $115 | $63-45% |
| Performance per Dollar | 72.6 | 136.2+88% |
| Codename | Polaris 30 | GP104 |
| Release | November 15 2018 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #285 | #304 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX590 GME and Quadro P3200
