CPU
GPU
Radeon X1200
Popular choices:
RADEON 9550
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon X1200 is positioned at rank 724 and the RADEON 9550 is on rank 363, so the RADEON 9550 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1200
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9550
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon X1200 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon X1200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The RADEON 9550 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON 9550 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon X1200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon X1200 | RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.1%) |
| Longevity | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon X1200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $30 for the RADEON 9550, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 88.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon X1200 | RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+88.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1200 and RADEON 9550
Radeon X1200
The Radeon X1200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 33 points.
RADEON 9550
The RADEON 9550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon X1200 scores 33 versus the RADEON 9550's 35 — the RADEON 9550 leads by 6.1%. The Radeon X1200 is built on GCN 3.0 while the RADEON 9550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon X1200) vs 512 (RADEON 9550). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon X1200) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (RADEON 9550). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 1183 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon X1200 | RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 33 | 35+6% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7864 TFLOPS | 1.211 TFLOPS+54% |
| Boost Clock | 1024 MHz | 1183 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 128 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon X1200 | RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon X1200 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9550 has 256 MB. The Radeon X1200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon X1200) vs 256 KB (RADEON 9550) — the RADEON 9550 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon X1200 | RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon X1200 draws 50W versus the RADEON 9550's 50W — a 0% difference. The RADEON 9550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1200) vs 350W (RADEON 9550). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon X1200 | RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7 | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X1200 launched at $80 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the RADEON 9550 launched at $129 and now averages $30. The Radeon X1200 costs 50% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.2 (Radeon X1200) vs 1.2 (RADEON 9550) — the Radeon X1200 offers 83.3% better value. The Radeon X1200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon X1200 | RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80-38% | $129 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-50% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.2+83% | 1.2 |
| Codename | Polaris 24 | Lexa |
| Release | May 13 2019 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #898 | #668 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon X1200 and RADEON 9550
