
Radeon X1200 vs Quadro FX 1300

Radeon X1200
Popular choices:

Quadro FX 1300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon X1200 is positioned at rank 724 and the Quadro FX 1300 is on rank 421, so the Quadro FX 1300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1200
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1300
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon X1200 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2008). The Radeon X1200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 1300 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 1300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon X1200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon X1200 | Quadro FX 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) |
| Longevity | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro FX 1300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $15 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 3% better value per dollar than the Radeon X1200.
| Insight | Radeon X1200 | Quadro FX 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1200 and Quadro FX 1300

Radeon X1200
The Radeon X1200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 33 points.

Quadro FX 1300
The Quadro FX 1300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon X1200 scores 33 and the Quadro FX 1300 reaches 34 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon X1200 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Quadro FX 1300 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon X1200) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1300). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon X1200) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1300).
| Feature | Radeon X1200 | Quadro FX 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 33 | 34+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+60% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7864 TFLOPS+26% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 80+233% |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon X1200 | Quadro FX 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon X1200 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1300 has 128 MB. The Radeon X1200 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon X1200) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 1300) — the Quadro FX 1300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon X1200 | Quadro FX 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon X1200 draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 1300's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The Radeon X1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1200) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon X1200 | Quadro FX 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-74% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7+250% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X1200 launched at $80 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Quadro FX 1300 launched at $599 and now averages $15. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.2 (Radeon X1200) vs 2.3 (Quadro FX 1300) — the Quadro FX 1300 offers 4.5% better value. The Radeon X1200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon X1200 | Quadro FX 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80-87% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.2 | 2.3+5% |
| Codename | Polaris 24 | GT200B |
| Release | May 13 2019 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #898 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











