Radeon X1200
VS
RADEON 9500

Radeon X1200 vs RADEON 9500

AMD

Radeon X1200

2019Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
VS
AMD

RADEON 9500

2015Core: 735 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon X1200 is positioned at rank 724 and the RADEON 9500 is on rank 737, so the Radeon X1200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1200

#714
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
26480%
#716
24005%
#717
23941%
#721
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
21771%
#722
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
21622%
#724
Radeon X1200
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
100%
#725
Radeon 2100
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
98%
#726
GeForce 6800
MSRP: $299|Avg: $50
93%
#727
Radeon 3100
MSRP: $199|Avg: $30
90%
#728
GeForce 6800 GT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
88%
#729
GeForce 7950 GX2
MSRP: $599|Avg: $80
83%
#730
Mobility Radeon X1450
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
80%
#731
MOBILITY RADEON X1800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $50
80%
#732
MOBILITY RADEON 9550
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
73%
#733
MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP
MSRP: $20|Avg: $5
73%
#734
GeForce 6200
MSRP: $129|Avg: $10
71%
#736
GeForce FX 5500
MSRP: $37|Avg: $30
54%
#737
RADEON 9500
MSRP: $179|Avg: $30
49%
#738
MOBILITY RADEON 9800
MSRP: $229|Avg: $25
49%
#739
RADEON X850 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
39%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9500

#727
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
54285%
#729
49210%
#730
49080%
#734
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
44630%
#735
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
44325%
#737
RADEON 9500
MSRP: $179|Avg: $30
100%
#738
MOBILITY RADEON 9800
MSRP: $229|Avg: $25
100%
#739
RADEON X850 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
80%
#740
RADEON 9800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
75%
#742
RADEON 9000
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
50%
#743
RADEON 9200 SE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $15
50%
#744
MOBILITY RADEON 7500
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
40%
#745
MOBILITY RADEON 9200
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
30%
#746
MOBILITY RADEON 9000
MSRP: $50|Avg: $5
30%
#747
GeForce4 MX 420
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
25%
#748
RADEON 9250
MSRP: $79|Avg: $25
20%
#749
RADEON 9200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
20%
#750
GeForce 256
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
15%
#751
GeForce4 MX 440
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
15%
#752
GeForce2 MX/MX 400
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
15%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon X1200 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon X1200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The RADEON 9500 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RADEON 9500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 9.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon X1200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon X1200RADEON 9500
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-9.1%)
Leading raw performance (+9.1%)
Longevity
GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon X1200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $30 for the RADEON 9500, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 83.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon X1200RADEON 9500
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+83.3%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1200 and RADEON 9500

AMD

Radeon X1200

The Radeon X1200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 33 points.

AMD

RADEON 9500

The RADEON 9500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 36 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon X1200 scores 33 versus the RADEON 9500's 36 — the RADEON 9500 leads by 9.1%. The Radeon X1200 is built on GCN 3.0 while the RADEON 9500 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon X1200) vs 2,048 (RADEON 9500). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon X1200) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON 9500). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureRadeon X1200RADEON 9500
G3D Mark Score
33
36+9%
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
2048+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7864 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS+421%
Boost Clock
1024 MHz+2%
1000 MHz
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
128+433%
L1 Cache
96 KB
512 KB+433%
L2 Cache
128 KB
512 KB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon X1200RADEON 9500
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon X1200 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9500 has 128 MB. The Radeon X1200 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon X1200) vs 512 KB (RADEON 9500) — the RADEON 9500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon X1200RADEON 9500
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+300%
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
128 KB
512 KB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon X1200 draws 50W versus the RADEON 9500's 95W — a 62.1% difference. The Radeon X1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1200) vs 350W (RADEON 9500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

FeatureRadeon X1200RADEON 9500
TDP
50W-47%
95W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Perf/Watt
0.7+75%
0.4
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon X1200 launched at $80 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the RADEON 9500 launched at $179 and now averages $30. The Radeon X1200 costs 50% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.2 (Radeon X1200) vs 1.2 (RADEON 9500) — the Radeon X1200 offers 83.3% better value. The Radeon X1200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon X1200RADEON 9500
MSRP
$80-55%
$179
Avg Price (30d)
$15-50%
$30
Performance per Dollar
2.2+83%
1.2
Codename
Polaris 24
Amethyst
Release
May 13 2019
September 29 2015
Ranking
#898
#420