
Radeon X1200 vs GeForce PCX 5900

Radeon X1200
Popular choices:

GeForce PCX 5900
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon X1200 is positioned at rank #724 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1200
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon X1200 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2011). The Radeon X1200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce PCX 5900 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce PCX 5900 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon X1200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon X1200 | GeForce PCX 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) |
| Longevity | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce PCX 5900 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1200 and GeForce PCX 5900

Radeon X1200
The Radeon X1200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 33 points.

GeForce PCX 5900
The GeForce PCX 5900 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon X1200 scores 33 and the GeForce PCX 5900 reaches 34 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon X1200 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce PCX 5900 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon X1200) vs 1,024 (GeForce PCX 5900). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon X1200) vs 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce PCX 5900).
| Feature | Radeon X1200 | GeForce PCX 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 33 | 34+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1024 ×2+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7864 TFLOPS | 1.244 TFLOPS ×2+58% |
| ROPs | 8 | 48 ×2+500% |
| TMUs | 24 | 64 ×2+167% |
| L1 Cache | 0.09 MB | 1 MB+1011% |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 768 KB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon X1200 | GeForce PCX 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon X1200 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce PCX 5900 has 256 MB. The Radeon X1200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon X1200) vs 768 KB (GeForce PCX 5900) — the GeForce PCX 5900 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon X1200 | GeForce PCX 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 768 KB+500% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon X1200 draws 50W versus the GeForce PCX 5900's 365W — a 151.8% difference. The Radeon X1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1200) vs 350W (GeForce PCX 5900). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon X1200 | GeForce PCX 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-86% | 365W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7+600% | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X1200 launched at $80 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce PCX 5900 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The GeForce PCX 5900 costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.2 (Radeon X1200) vs Infinity (GeForce PCX 5900) — the GeForce PCX 5900 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon X1200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon X1200 | GeForce PCX 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.2 | Infinity |
| Codename | Polaris 24 | GF110 |
| Release | May 13 2019 | March 24 2011 |
| Ranking | #898 | #555 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











