
Radeon X1200 vs GeForce 6100

Radeon X1200
Popular choices:

GeForce 6100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon X1200 is positioned at rank #724 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1200
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon X1200 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon X1200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 6100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon X1200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 22.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 6100.
| Insight | Radeon X1200 | GeForce 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+22.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-22.2%) |
| Longevity | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon X1200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1200 and GeForce 6100

Radeon X1200
The Radeon X1200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 33 points.

GeForce 6100
The GeForce 6100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon X1200 scores 33 versus the GeForce 6100's 27 — the Radeon X1200 leads by 22.2%. The Radeon X1200 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce 6100 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon X1200) vs 384 (GeForce 6100). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon X1200) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce 6100). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 1468 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon X1200 | GeForce 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 33+22% | 27 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7864 TFLOPS | 1.127 TFLOPS+43% |
| Boost Clock | 1024 MHz | 1468 MHz+43% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 144 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 512 KB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon X1200 | GeForce 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon X1200) vs 512 KB (GeForce 6100) — the GeForce 6100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon X1200 | GeForce 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 512 KB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon X1200 draws 50W versus the GeForce 6100's 30W — a 50% difference. The GeForce 6100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1200) vs 350W (GeForce 6100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon X1200 | GeForce 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 30W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7 | 0.9+29% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X1200 launched at $80 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce 6100 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The GeForce 6100 costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.2 (Radeon X1200) vs Infinity (GeForce 6100) — the GeForce 6100 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon X1200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon X1200 | GeForce 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.2 | Infinity |
| Codename | Polaris 24 | GP108 |
| Release | May 13 2019 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #898 | #641 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















