Radeon X1600 Pro vs Quadro FX Go1400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon X1600 Pro is positioned at rank 342 and the Quadro FX Go1400 is on rank 349, so the Radeon X1600 Pro offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1600 Pro

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

10991%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

10559%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

10436%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

10418%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

10397%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

10338%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

10208%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

10170%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

10076%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

10048%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

9927%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

9906%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

9727%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

9721%

#327

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

12121%

#342

Radeon X1600 Pro

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

100%

#343

RADEON X300SE

MSRP: $60|Avg: $60

95%

#345

Radeon X1600 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

88%

#346

RADEON X800 GTO

MSRP: $199|Avg: $199

88%

#347

Radeon X1300

MSRP: $100|Avg: $49

88%

#348

Radeon X1800 GTO

MSRP: $249|Avg: $20

86%

#349

GeForce 7800 GT

MSRP: $449|Avg: $20

82%

#351

RADEON E2400

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

79%

#352

Radeon X1650 GTO

MSRP: $150|Avg: $20

76%

#353

RADEON X800GT

MSRP: $160|Avg: $10

76%

#354

RADEON X600 SE

MSRP: $100|Avg: $5

74%

#355

Radeon X1900 GT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $20

74%

#356

RADEON X700

MSRP: $149|Avg: $10

74%

#357

GeForce G200

MSRP: $299|Avg: $15

68%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX Go1400

#334

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

14483%

#349

Quadro FX Go1400

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#350

GRID K520

MSRP: $3599|Avg: $50

96%

#351

GRID P40-12Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699

95%

#352

FirePro 2270

MSRP: $149|Avg: $30

93%

#353

FirePro 2460

MSRP: $180|Avg: $10

92%

#355

Quadro FX 580

MSRP: $199|Avg: $500

89%

#356

FirePro 3D V5700

MSRP: $599|Avg: $25

89%

#357

GRID M60-1B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

88%

#359

FireStream 9270

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $20

87%

#360

Quadro 400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $500

86%

#361

FirePro 2260

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

86%

#362

Quadro FX 380 LP

MSRP: $169|Avg: $15

84%

#364

Quadro FX 1800

MSRP: $489|Avg: $100

79%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon X1600 Pro is significantly newer (2020 vs 2008). The Radeon X1600 Pro likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX Go1400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX Go1400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon X1600 Pro.

Insight	Radeon X1600 Pro	Quadro FX Go1400
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+3%)
Longevity	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX Go1400 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon X1600 Pro Benchmark Check

Quadro FX Go1400 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1600 Pro and Quadro FX Go1400

Radeon X1600 Pro

The Radeon X1600 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 99 points.

Quadro FX Go1400

The Quadro FX Go1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points. Launch price was $1,799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon X1600 Pro scores 99 and the Quadro FX Go1400 reaches 102 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon X1600 Pro is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Quadro FX Go1400 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon X1600 Pro) vs 192 (Quadro FX Go1400). Raw compute: 6.39 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600 Pro) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX Go1400).

Feature	Radeon X1600 Pro	Quadro FX Go1400
G3D Mark Score	99	102+3%
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	7 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	2048+967%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.39 TFLOPS+1282%	0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+167%	24
TMUs	128+100%	64
L2 Cache	3 MB+1479%	0.19 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon X1600 Pro	Quadro FX Go1400
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon X1600 Pro comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX Go1400 has 4 GB. The Quadro FX Go1400 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Radeon X1600 Pro) vs 0.19 MB (Quadro FX Go1400) — the Radeon X1600 Pro has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon X1600 Pro	Quadro FX Go1400
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB+1479%	0.19 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon X1600 Pro draws 150W versus the Quadro FX Go1400's 150W — a 0% difference. The Quadro FX Go1400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1600 Pro) vs 350W (Quadro FX Go1400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.