Radeon X1600 Pro vs Quadro FX 3400/4400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon X1600 Pro is positioned at rank 342 and the Quadro FX 3400/4400 is on rank 421, so the Radeon X1600 Pro offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1600 Pro

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

10991%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

10559%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

10436%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

10418%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

10397%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

10338%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

10208%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

10170%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

10076%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

10048%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

9927%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

9906%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

9727%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

9721%

#327

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

12121%

#342

Radeon X1600 Pro

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

100%

#343

RADEON X300SE

MSRP: $60|Avg: $60

95%

#345

Radeon X1600 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

88%

#346

RADEON X800 GTO

MSRP: $199|Avg: $199

88%

#347

Radeon X1300

MSRP: $100|Avg: $49

88%

#348

Radeon X1800 GTO

MSRP: $249|Avg: $20

86%

#349

GeForce 7800 GT

MSRP: $449|Avg: $20

82%

#351

RADEON E2400

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

79%

#352

Radeon X1650 GTO

MSRP: $150|Avg: $20

76%

#353

RADEON X800GT

MSRP: $160|Avg: $10

76%

#354

RADEON X600 SE

MSRP: $100|Avg: $5

74%

#355

Radeon X1900 GT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $20

74%

#356

RADEON X700

MSRP: $149|Avg: $10

74%

#357

GeForce G200

MSRP: $299|Avg: $15

68%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3400/4400

#405

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

246217%

#420

Quadro FX 1300

MSRP: $599|Avg: $15

100%

#421

Quadro FX 3400/4400

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $50

100%

#422

Quadro FX 4000

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $50

83%

#423

RADEON IGP 320

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

67%

#424

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

33%

#425

Quadro FX 2000

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40

17%

#426

GRID V100-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

0%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon X1600 Pro is significantly newer (2020 vs 2008). The Radeon X1600 Pro likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 3400/4400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 3400/4400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon X1600 Pro offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon X1600 Pro	Quadro FX 3400/4400
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+5.1%)
Longevity	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro FX 3400/4400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $50 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 2.9% better value per dollar than the Radeon X1600 Pro.

Insight	Radeon X1600 Pro	Quadro FX 3400/4400
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+2.9%)
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($49)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon X1600 Pro Benchmark Check

Quadro FX 3400/4400 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1600 Pro and Quadro FX 3400/4400

Radeon X1600 Pro

The Radeon X1600 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 99 points.

Quadro FX 3400/4400

The Quadro FX 3400/4400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 104 points. Launch price was $1,799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon X1600 Pro scores 99 versus the Quadro FX 3400/4400's 104 — the Quadro FX 3400/4400 leads by 5.1%. The Radeon X1600 Pro is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Quadro FX 3400/4400 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon X1600 Pro) vs 192 (Quadro FX 3400/4400). Raw compute: 6.39 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600 Pro) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3400/4400).

Feature	Radeon X1600 Pro	Quadro FX 3400/4400
G3D Mark Score	99	104+5%
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	7 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	2048+967%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.39 TFLOPS+1282%	0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+167%	24
TMUs	128+100%	64
L2 Cache	3 MB+1479%	0.19 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon X1600 Pro	Quadro FX 3400/4400
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon X1600 Pro comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 3400/4400 has 256 MB. The Radeon X1600 Pro offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Radeon X1600 Pro) vs 0.19 MB (Quadro FX 3400/4400) — the Radeon X1600 Pro has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon X1600 Pro	Quadro FX 3400/4400
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB+1479%	0.19 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon X1600 Pro draws 150W versus the Quadro FX 3400/4400's 150W — a 0% difference. The Quadro FX 3400/4400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1600 Pro) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3400/4400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon X1600 Pro	Quadro FX 3400/4400
TDP	150W	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	0.7	0.7

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon X1600 Pro launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Quadro FX 3400/4400 launched at $1799 and now averages $50. The Radeon X1600 Pro costs 2% less ($1 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.0 (Radeon X1600 Pro) vs 2.1 (Quadro FX 3400/4400) — the Quadro FX 3400/4400 offers 5% better value. The Radeon X1600 Pro is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2008).