Radeon X1600 Pro
VS
Radeon 3000

Radeon X1600 Pro vs Radeon 3000

AMD

Radeon X1600 Pro

2020Core: 1130 MHzBoost: 1560 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon 3000

2019Core: 1082 MHzBoost: 1218 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon X1600 Pro is positioned at rank #342 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1600 Pro

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
10991%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
10559%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
10436%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
10418%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
10397%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
10338%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
10208%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
10170%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
10076%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
10048%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
9927%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
9906%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
9727%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
9721%
#327
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
12121%
#342
Radeon X1600 Pro
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
100%
#343
RADEON X300SE
MSRP: $60|Avg: $60
95%
#345
Radeon X1600 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
88%
#346
RADEON X800 GTO
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
88%
#347
Radeon X1300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $49
88%
#348
Radeon X1800 GTO
MSRP: $249|Avg: $20
86%
#349
GeForce 7800 GT
MSRP: $449|Avg: $20
82%
#351
RADEON E2400
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
79%
#352
Radeon X1650 GTO
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
76%
#353
RADEON X800GT
MSRP: $160|Avg: $10
76%
#354
RADEON X600 SE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
74%
#355
Radeon X1900 GT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $20
74%
#356
RADEON X700
MSRP: $149|Avg: $10
74%
#357
GeForce G200
MSRP: $299|Avg: $15
68%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon X1600 Pro is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 3000.

InsightRadeon X1600 ProRadeon 3000
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1%)
Longevity
RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm)
GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon X1600 Pro offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $49 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1% better value per dollar than the Radeon 3000.

InsightRadeon X1600 ProRadeon 3000
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+1%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1600 Pro and Radeon 3000

AMD

Radeon X1600 Pro

The Radeon X1600 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 99 points.

AMD

Radeon 3000

The Radeon 3000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 98 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon X1600 Pro scores 99 and the Radeon 3000 reaches 98 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon X1600 Pro is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon 3000 uses GCN 4.0, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon X1600 Pro) vs 512 (Radeon 3000). Raw compute: 6.39 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600 Pro) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3000). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 1218 MHz.

FeatureRadeon X1600 ProRadeon 3000
G3D Mark Score
99+1%
98
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
7 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2048+300%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.39 TFLOPS+412%
1.247 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1560 MHz+28%
1218 MHz
ROPs
64+300%
16
TMUs
128+300%
32
L2 Cache
3 MB+500%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon X1600 ProRadeon 3000
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Radeon X1600 Pro) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon 3000) — the Radeon X1600 Pro has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon X1600 ProRadeon 3000
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
3 MB+500%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (Radeon X1600 Pro) vs 10_0 (Radeon 3000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon X1600 ProRadeon 3000
DirectX
9.0c
10_0+11%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Radeon X1600 Pro) vs Avivo HD (Radeon 3000). Decoder: Avivo vs Avivo HD.

FeatureRadeon X1600 ProRadeon 3000
Encoder
None
Avivo HD
Decoder
Avivo
Avivo HD
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon X1600 Pro draws 150W versus the Radeon 3000's 50W — a 100% difference. The Radeon 3000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1600 Pro) vs 350W (Radeon 3000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

FeatureRadeon X1600 ProRadeon 3000
TDP
150W
50W-67%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
1mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
0.7
2.0+186%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon X1600 Pro launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Radeon 3000 launched at $0 and now averages $49. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.0 (Radeon X1600 Pro) vs 2.0 (Radeon 3000) — the Radeon 3000 offers 0% better value. The Radeon X1600 Pro is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).

FeatureRadeon X1600 ProRadeon 3000
MSRP
$149
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$49
$49
Performance per Dollar
2.0
2.0
Codename
Navi 10
Polaris 23
Release
January 21 2020
May 13 2019
Ranking
#216
#757