
Radeon X1600 Pro
Popular choices:

Radeon 3000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon X1600 Pro is positioned at rank #342 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1600 Pro
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon X1600 Pro is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 3000.
| Insight | Radeon X1600 Pro | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon X1600 Pro offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $49 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1% better value per dollar than the Radeon 3000.
| Insight | Radeon X1600 Pro | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1600 Pro and Radeon 3000

Radeon X1600 Pro
The Radeon X1600 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 99 points.

Radeon 3000
The Radeon 3000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 98 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon X1600 Pro scores 99 and the Radeon 3000 reaches 98 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon X1600 Pro is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon 3000 uses GCN 4.0, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon X1600 Pro) vs 512 (Radeon 3000). Raw compute: 6.39 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600 Pro) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3000). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 1218 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon X1600 Pro | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 99+1% | 98 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+300% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.39 TFLOPS+412% | 1.247 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz+28% | 1218 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+300% | 32 |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon X1600 Pro | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Radeon X1600 Pro) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon 3000) — the Radeon X1600 Pro has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon X1600 Pro | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (Radeon X1600 Pro) vs 10_0 (Radeon 3000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon X1600 Pro | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 10_0+11% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon X1600 Pro) vs Avivo HD (Radeon 3000). Decoder: Avivo vs Avivo HD.
| Feature | Radeon X1600 Pro | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | Avivo HD |
| Decoder | Avivo | Avivo HD |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon X1600 Pro draws 150W versus the Radeon 3000's 50W — a 100% difference. The Radeon 3000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1600 Pro) vs 350W (Radeon 3000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon X1600 Pro | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 50W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7 | 2.0+186% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X1600 Pro launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Radeon 3000 launched at $0 and now averages $49. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.0 (Radeon X1600 Pro) vs 2.0 (Radeon 3000) — the Radeon 3000 offers 0% better value. The Radeon X1600 Pro is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon X1600 Pro | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Codename | Navi 10 | Polaris 23 |
| Release | January 21 2020 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #216 | #757 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















