CPU
GPU
Radeon X1650 Pro
Popular choices:
GeForce 6600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon X1650 Pro is positioned at rank 334 and the GeForce 6600 is on rank 362, so the Radeon X1650 Pro offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1650 Pro
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon X1650 Pro is significantly newer (2023 vs 2012). The Radeon X1650 Pro likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 6600 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 6600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon X1650 Pro offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon X1650 Pro | GeForce 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 6600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $15 for the Radeon X1650 Pro, it costs 33% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 51.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon X1650 Pro | GeForce 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+51.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1650 Pro and GeForce 6600
Radeon X1650 Pro
The Radeon X1650 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 85 points. Launch price was $549.
GeForce 6600
The GeForce 6600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 86 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon X1650 Pro scores 85 and the GeForce 6600 reaches 86 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon X1650 Pro is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce 6600 uses Kepler, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon X1650 Pro) vs 960 (GeForce 6600). Boost clocks: 2581 MHz vs 1033 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon X1650 Pro | GeForce 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 85 | 86+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+167% | 960 |
| Boost Clock | 2581 MHz+150% | 1033 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+167% | 24 |
| TMUs | 160+100% | 80 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon X1650 Pro | GeForce 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon X1650 Pro comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 6600 has 256 MB. The Radeon X1650 Pro offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon X1650 Pro | GeForce 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon X1650 Pro draws 250W versus the GeForce 6600's 140W — a 56.4% difference. The GeForce 6600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1650 Pro) vs 350W (GeForce 6600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon X1650 Pro | GeForce 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 140W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 183mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 0.6+100% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X1650 Pro launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce 6600 launched at $270 and now averages $10. The GeForce 6600 costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.7 (Radeon X1650 Pro) vs 8.6 (GeForce 6600) — the GeForce 6600 offers 50.9% better value. The Radeon X1650 Pro is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon X1650 Pro | GeForce 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-63% | $270 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $10-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.7 | 8.6+51% |
| Codename | Navi 22 | GK106 |
| Release | October 17 2023 | September 6 2012 |
| Ranking | #92 | #490 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon X1650 Pro and GeForce 6600
