CPU
GPU
Radeon X1650 Pro
Popular choices:
nForce 750a SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon X1650 Pro is positioned at rank #334 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1650 Pro
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon X1650 Pro is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The Radeon X1650 Pro likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The nForce 750a SLI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon X1650 Pro is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the nForce 750a SLI.
| Insight | Radeon X1650 Pro | nForce 750a SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon X1650 Pro remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1650 Pro and nForce 750a SLI
Radeon X1650 Pro
The Radeon X1650 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 85 points. Launch price was $549.
nForce 750a SLI
The nForce 750a SLI is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 967 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 83 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon X1650 Pro scores 85 and the nForce 750a SLI reaches 83 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon X1650 Pro is built on RDNA 2.0 while the nForce 750a SLI uses Kepler, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon X1650 Pro) vs 768 (nForce 750a SLI).
| Feature | Radeon X1650 Pro | nForce 750a SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 85+2% | 83 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+233% | 768 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon X1650 Pro | nForce 750a SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon X1650 Pro | nForce 750a SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon X1650 Pro draws 250W versus the nForce 750a SLI's 30W — a 157.1% difference. The nForce 750a SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1650 Pro) vs 350W (nForce 750a SLI). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon X1650 Pro | nForce 750a SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 30W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 2.8+833% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X1650 Pro launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the nForce 750a SLI launched at $0 and now averages $0. The nForce 750a SLI costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.7 (Radeon X1650 Pro) vs Infinity (nForce 750a SLI) — the nForce 750a SLI offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon X1650 Pro is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon X1650 Pro | nForce 750a SLI |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.7 | Infinity |
| Codename | Navi 22 | N14P-GT |
| Release | October 17 2023 | April 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #92 | #616 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon X1650 Pro and nForce 750a SLI
