CPU
GPU
Radeon X1650 Pro
Popular choices:
RADEON X800 GT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon X1650 Pro is positioned at rank 334 and the RADEON X800 GT is on rank 361, so the Radeon X1650 Pro offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1650 Pro
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X800 GT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon X1650 Pro is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON X800 GT.
| Insight | Radeon X1650 Pro | RADEON X800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon X1650 Pro offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $15 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1.2% better value per dollar than the RADEON X800 GT.
| Insight | Radeon X1650 Pro | RADEON X800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1650 Pro and RADEON X800 GT
Radeon X1650 Pro
The Radeon X1650 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 85 points. Launch price was $549.
RADEON X800 GT
The RADEON X800 GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 84 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon X1650 Pro scores 85 and the RADEON X800 GT reaches 84 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon X1650 Pro is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RADEON X800 GT uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon X1650 Pro) vs 4,608 (RADEON X800 GT). Boost clocks: 2581 MHz vs 2250 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon X1650 Pro | RADEON X800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 85+1% | 84 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4608+80% |
| Boost Clock | 2581 MHz+15% | 2250 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 128+100% |
| TMUs | 160 | 288+80% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon X1650 Pro | RADEON X800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon X1650 Pro comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X800 GT has 256 MB. The Radeon X1650 Pro offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon X1650 Pro | RADEON X800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon X1650 Pro draws 250W versus the RADEON X800 GT's 300W — a 18.2% difference. The Radeon X1650 Pro is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1650 Pro) vs 350W (RADEON X800 GT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon X1650 Pro | RADEON X800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-17% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X1650 Pro launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the RADEON X800 GT launched at $249 and now averages $15. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.7 (Radeon X1650 Pro) vs 5.6 (RADEON X800 GT) — the Radeon X1650 Pro offers 1.8% better value. The Radeon X1650 Pro is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon X1650 Pro | RADEON X800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-60% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.7+2% | 5.6 |
| Codename | Navi 22 | Navi 21 |
| Release | October 17 2023 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #92 | #42 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon X1650 Pro and RADEON X800 GT
