CPU
GPU
Radeon X1650 Pro
Popular choices:
Mobility Radeon HD 2400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon X1650 Pro is positioned at rank 334 and the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 is on rank 687, so the Radeon X1650 Pro offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1650 Pro
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 2400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon X1650 Pro is significantly newer (2023 vs 2009). The Radeon X1650 Pro likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon X1650 Pro offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon X1650 Pro | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.9%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $1 versus $15 for the Radeon X1650 Pro, it costs 93% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 1488.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon X1650 Pro | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1488.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) | ✅More affordable ($1) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1650 Pro and Mobility Radeon HD 2400
Radeon X1650 Pro
The Radeon X1650 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 85 points. Launch price was $549.
Mobility Radeon HD 2400
The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 90 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon X1650 Pro scores 85 versus the Mobility Radeon HD 2400's 90 — the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 leads by 5.9%. The Radeon X1650 Pro is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 uses TeraScale, both on 7 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon X1650 Pro) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400).
| Feature | Radeon X1650 Pro | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 85 | 90+6% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+220% | 800 |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 160+300% | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon X1650 Pro | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon X1650 Pro comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 has 256 MB. The Radeon X1650 Pro offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon X1650 Pro | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon X1650 Pro draws 250W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 2400's 30W — a 157.1% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1650 Pro) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon X1650 Pro | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 30W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 3.0+900% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X1650 Pro launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 launched at $79 and now averages $1. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 costs 93.3% less ($14 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.7 (Radeon X1650 Pro) vs 90.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400) — the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 offers 1478.9% better value. The Radeon X1650 Pro is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon X1650 Pro | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $79-21% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $1-93% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.7 | 90.0+1479% |
| Codename | Navi 22 | M98 |
| Release | October 17 2023 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #92 | #927 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon X1650 Pro and Mobility Radeon HD 2400
