Radeon X1650 SE vs GeForce 8400M GT

Radeon X1650 SE

2023Boost: 2581 MHz

GeForce 8400M GT

2014Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Radeon X1650 SE

250

+6.0%

MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700

MOBILITY RADEON 9800

Mobility Radeon HD 2300

Mobility Radeon HD 3410

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

0.0%

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8400M GT

#672

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

8102%

#674

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

7345%

#675

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

7325%

#679

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

6661%

#680

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

6616%

#682

GeForce 8400M GT

MSRP: $50|Avg: $30

100%

#683

GeForce 9200M GS

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

96%

#684

Mobility Radeon HD 3410

MSRP: $49|Avg: $10

96%

#685

MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL

MSRP: $49|Avg: $10

91%

#686

GeForce 9300M GS

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

88%

#687

Mobility Radeon HD 2400

MSRP: $79|Avg: $1

85%

#688

GeForce 6150 LE

MSRP: $30|Avg: $10

82%

#689

Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2

MSRP: $449|Avg: $50

79%

#690

GeForce 9450

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

78%

#691

GeForce 9800 GX2

MSRP: $599|Avg: $75

76%

#692

GeForce 7900 GS

MSRP: $259|Avg: $50

75%

#693

MOBILITY RADEON X600

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

75%

#694

Mobility Radeon HD 4250

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

73%

#695

Mobility Radeon X2300 HD

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

73%

#696

Mobility Radeon X2300

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

73%

#697

Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $12

72%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon X1650 SE is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The Radeon X1650 SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 8400M GT lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon X1650 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 8400M GT.

Insight	Radeon X1650 SE	GeForce 8400M GT
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+6%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-6%)
Longevity	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 8400M GT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $49 for the Radeon X1650 SE, it costs 39% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 54.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon X1650 SE	GeForce 8400M GT
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+54.1%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49)	✅More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon X1650 SE Benchmark Check

GeForce 8400M GT Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1650 SE and GeForce 8400M GT

Radeon X1650 SE

The Radeon X1650 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points. Launch price was $549.

GeForce 8400M GT

The GeForce 8400M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon X1650 SE scores 71 versus the GeForce 8400M GT's 67 — the Radeon X1650 SE leads by 6%. The Radeon X1650 SE is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce 8400M GT uses Maxwell, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon X1650 SE) vs 384 (GeForce 8400M GT). Boost clocks: 2581 MHz vs 1124 MHz.

Feature	Radeon X1650 SE	GeForce 8400M GT
G3D Mark Score	71+6%	67
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Maxwell
Process Node	7 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2560+567%	384
Boost Clock	2581 MHz+130%	1124 MHz
ROPs	64+700%	8
TMUs	160+900%	16

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon X1650 SE	GeForce 8400M GT
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon X1650 SE comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8400M GT has 256 MB. The Radeon X1650 SE offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Radeon X1650 SE	GeForce 8400M GT
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (Radeon X1650 SE) vs 10.0 (GeForce 8400M GT). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

Feature	Radeon X1650 SE	GeForce 8400M GT
DirectX	9.0c	10.0+11%
OpenGL	2.1	3.3+57%
Max Displays	2+100%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Avivo (Radeon X1650 SE) vs No (GeForce 8400M GT). Decoder: Avivo vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9 (Radeon X1650 SE) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 8400M GT).

Feature	Radeon X1650 SE	GeForce 8400M GT
Encoder	Avivo	No
Decoder	Avivo	PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs	MPEG-2,WMV9	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon X1650 SE draws 250W versus the GeForce 8400M GT's 33W — a 153.4% difference. The GeForce 8400M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1650 SE) vs 350W (GeForce 8400M GT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Radeon X1650 SE	GeForce 8400M GT
TDP	250W	33W-87%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C	75°C
Perf/Watt	0.3	2.0+567%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon X1650 SE launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce 8400M GT launched at $50 and now averages $30. The GeForce 8400M GT costs 38.8% less ($19 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.4 (Radeon X1650 SE) vs 2.2 (GeForce 8400M GT) — the GeForce 8400M GT offers 57.1% better value. The Radeon X1650 SE is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).