Radeon X1650 SE vs RADEON X800GT
Radeon X1650 SE
Popular choices:
RADEON X800GT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X800GT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X800GT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 12.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon X1650 SE.
| Insight | Radeon X1650 SE | RADEON X800GT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-12.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+12.7%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON X800GT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $49 for the Radeon X1650 SE, it costs 80% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 452.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon X1650 SE | RADEON X800GT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+452.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1650 SE and RADEON X800GT
Radeon X1650 SE
The Radeon X1650 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points. Launch price was $549.
RADEON X800GT
The RADEON X800GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 80 points. Launch price was $579.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon X1650 SE scores 71 versus the RADEON X800GT's 80 — the RADEON X800GT leads by 12.7%. The Radeon X1650 SE is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RADEON X800GT uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon X1650 SE) vs 3,840 (RADEON X800GT). Boost clocks: 2581 MHz vs 2105 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon X1650 SE | RADEON X800GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 71 | 80+13% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3840+50% |
| Boost Clock | 2581 MHz+23% | 2105 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 240+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon X1650 SE | RADEON X800GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon X1650 SE | RADEON X800GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon X1650 SE draws 250W versus the RADEON X800GT's 250W — a 0% difference. The RADEON X800GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1650 SE) vs 350W (RADEON X800GT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon X1650 SE | RADEON X800GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X1650 SE launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the RADEON X800GT launched at $160 and now averages $10. The RADEON X800GT costs 79.6% less ($39 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.4 (Radeon X1650 SE) vs 8.0 (RADEON X800GT) — the RADEON X800GT offers 471.4% better value. The Radeon X1650 SE is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon X1650 SE | RADEON X800GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $160 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $10-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.4 | 8.0+471% |
| Codename | Navi 22 | Navi 21 |
| Release | October 17 2023 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #92 | #65 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon X1650 SE and RADEON X800GT
