Radeon X1650 SE vs Radeon X1650 GTO
Radeon X1650 SE
Popular choices:
Radeon X1650 GTO
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1650 GTO
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon X1650 GTO is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon X1650 SE.
| Insight | Radeon X1650 SE | Radeon X1650 GTO |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.6%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon X1650 GTO offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $49 for the Radeon X1650 SE, it costs 59% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 158.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon X1650 SE | Radeon X1650 GTO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+158.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1650 SE and Radeon X1650 GTO
Radeon X1650 SE
The Radeon X1650 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points. Launch price was $549.
Radeon X1650 GTO
The Radeon X1650 GTO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1925 MHz to 2324 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 335W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 75 points. Launch price was $1,099.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon X1650 SE scores 71 versus the Radeon X1650 GTO's 75 — the Radeon X1650 GTO leads by 5.6%. The Radeon X1650 SE is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon X1650 GTO uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon X1650 SE) vs 5,120 (Radeon X1650 GTO). Boost clocks: 2581 MHz vs 2324 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon X1650 SE | Radeon X1650 GTO |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 71 | 75+6% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 5120+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2581 MHz+11% | 2324 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 128+100% |
| TMUs | 160 | 320+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon X1650 SE | Radeon X1650 GTO |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon X1650 SE | Radeon X1650 GTO |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon X1650 SE draws 250W versus the Radeon X1650 GTO's 335W — a 29.1% difference. The Radeon X1650 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1650 SE) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 GTO). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon X1650 SE | Radeon X1650 GTO |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-25% | 335W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3+50% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X1650 SE launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Radeon X1650 GTO launched at $150 and now averages $20. The Radeon X1650 GTO costs 59.2% less ($29 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.4 (Radeon X1650 SE) vs 3.8 (Radeon X1650 GTO) — the Radeon X1650 GTO offers 171.4% better value. The Radeon X1650 SE is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | Radeon X1650 SE | Radeon X1650 GTO |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $20-59% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.4 | 3.8+171% |
| Codename | Navi 22 | Navi 21 |
| Release | October 17 2023 | May 10 2022 |
| Ranking | #92 | #25 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon X1650 SE and Radeon X1650 GTO
