Radeon X1650 SE vs Radeon 3100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 3100

#717

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

29343%

#719

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

26600%

#720

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

26530%

#724

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

24124%

#725

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

23959%

#727

Radeon 3100

MSRP: $199|Avg: $30

100%

#728

GeForce 6800 GT

MSRP: $399|Avg: $40

97%

#729

GeForce 7950 GX2

MSRP: $599|Avg: $80

92%

#730

Mobility Radeon X1450

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

89%

#731

MOBILITY RADEON X1800

MSRP: $399|Avg: $50

89%

#732

MOBILITY RADEON 9550

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

81%

#733

MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP

MSRP: $20|Avg: $5

81%

#734

GeForce 6200

MSRP: $129|Avg: $10

78%

#736

GeForce FX 5500

MSRP: $37|Avg: $30

59%

#737

MOBILITY RADEON 9800

MSRP: $229|Avg: $25

54%

#738

RADEON 9500

MSRP: $179|Avg: $30

54%

#739

RADEON X850 XT

MSRP: $499|Avg: $50

43%

#740

RADEON 9800

MSRP: $399|Avg: $399

41%

#742

RADEON 9000

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

27%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon 3100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon X1650 SE.

Insight	Radeon X1650 SE	Radeon 3100
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%)	✅Leading raw performance (+4.2%)
Longevity	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon 3100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $49 for the Radeon X1650 SE, it costs 39% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 70.2% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon X1650 SE	Radeon 3100
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+70.2%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49)	✅More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon X1650 SE Benchmark Check

Radeon 3100 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1650 SE and Radeon 3100

Radeon X1650 SE

The Radeon X1650 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points. Launch price was $549.

Radeon 3100

The Radeon 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 74 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon X1650 SE scores 71 and the Radeon 3100 reaches 74 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon X1650 SE is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon 3100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon X1650 SE) vs 512 (Radeon 3100). Boost clocks: 2581 MHz vs 1218 MHz.

Feature	Radeon X1650 SE	Radeon 3100
G3D Mark Score	71	74+4%
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	7 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2560+400%	512
Boost Clock	2581 MHz+112%	1218 MHz
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	160+400%	32

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon X1650 SE	Radeon 3100
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Radeon X1650 SE	Radeon 3100
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon X1650 SE draws 250W versus the Radeon 3100's 50W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 3100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1650 SE) vs 350W (Radeon 3100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon X1650 SE	Radeon 3100
TDP	250W	50W-80%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.3	1.5+400%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon X1650 SE launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Radeon 3100 launched at $199 and now averages $30. The Radeon 3100 costs 38.8% less ($19 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.4 (Radeon X1650 SE) vs 2.5 (Radeon 3100) — the Radeon 3100 offers 78.6% better value. The Radeon X1650 SE is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).