Radeon X1650 SE vs RADEON X700 PRO
Radeon X1650 SE
Popular choices:
RADEON X700 PRO
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X700 PRO
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X700 PRO is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon X1650 SE offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon X1650 SE | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+7%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON X700 PRO offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $49 for the Radeon X1650 SE, it costs 39% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 74.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon X1650 SE | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+74.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1650 SE and RADEON X700 PRO
Radeon X1650 SE
The Radeon X1650 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points. Launch price was $549.
RADEON X700 PRO
The RADEON X700 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 27 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1287 MHz to 2245 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 76 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon X1650 SE scores 71 versus the RADEON X700 PRO's 76 — the RADEON X700 PRO leads by 7%. The Radeon X1650 SE is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RADEON X700 PRO uses RDNA 3.0, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon X1650 SE) vs 5,120 (RADEON X700 PRO). Boost clocks: 2581 MHz vs 2245 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon X1650 SE | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 71 | 76+7% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 5120+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2581 MHz+15% | 2245 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 160+150% |
| TMUs | 160 | 320+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon X1650 SE | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon X1650 SE comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X700 PRO has 256 MB. The Radeon X1650 SE offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon X1650 SE | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (Radeon X1650 SE) vs 9_0b (RADEON X700 PRO). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon X1650 SE | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9_0b |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon X1650 SE draws 250W versus the RADEON X700 PRO's 260W — a 3.9% difference. The Radeon X1650 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1650 SE) vs 350W (RADEON X700 PRO). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon X1650 SE | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-4% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 170mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X1650 SE launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the RADEON X700 PRO launched at $179 and now averages $30. The RADEON X700 PRO costs 38.8% less ($19 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.4 (Radeon X1650 SE) vs 2.5 (RADEON X700 PRO) — the RADEON X700 PRO offers 78.6% better value.
| Feature | Radeon X1650 SE | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $179 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $30-39% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.4 | 2.5+79% |
| Codename | Navi 22 | Navi 31 |
| Release | October 17 2023 | July 27 2023 |
| Ranking | #92 | #29 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon X1650 SE and RADEON X700 PRO
