Radeon X1650 SE vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Radeon X1650 SE

2023Boost: 2581 MHz

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Radeon X1650 SE

250

0.0%

MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700

MOBILITY RADEON 9800

Mobility Radeon HD 2300

Mobility Radeon HD 3410

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

20,312

+28508.5%

GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)

GeForce RTX 2080 Super with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (móvel)

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

100%

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

96%

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

95%

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

95%

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

95%

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

94%

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

93%

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

93%

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

92%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

91%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

90%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

90%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

89%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

88%

#15

Radeon RX 6500 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $150

88%

#16

GeForce RTX 3070

MSRP: $499|Avg: $200

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 28508.5% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (8 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon X1650 SE.

Insight	Radeon X1650 SE	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-28508.5%)	✅Leading raw performance (+28508.5%)
Longevity	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm)	🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $280 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 4906.5% better value per dollar than the Radeon X1650 SE.

Insight	Radeon X1650 SE	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+4906.5%)
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($49)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon X1650 SE Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1650 SE and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Radeon X1650 SE

The Radeon X1650 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points. Launch price was $549.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon X1650 SE scores 71 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 28508.5%. The Radeon X1650 SE is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon X1650 SE) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 2581 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	Radeon X1650 SE	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
G3D Mark Score	71	20,312+28508%
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Ampere
Process Node	7 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	2560	4864+90%
Boost Clock	2581 MHz+55%	1665 MHz
ROPs	64	80+25%
TMUs	160+5%	152

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon X1650 SE	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon X1650 SE comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	Radeon X1650 SE	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	8 GB+1500%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (Radeon X1650 SE) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon X1650 SE	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
DirectX	9.0c	12 Ultimate (12_2)+33%
OpenGL	2.1	4.6+119%
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Avivo (Radeon X1650 SE) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: Avivo vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9 (Radeon X1650 SE) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).

Feature	Radeon X1650 SE	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Encoder	Avivo	NVENC (Ampere)
Decoder	Avivo	NVDEC (Ampere)
Codecs	MPEG-2,WMV9	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon X1650 SE draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1650 SE) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.

Feature	Radeon X1650 SE	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
TDP	250W	200W-20%
Recommended PSU	350W-42%	600W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	8-pin
Length	—	242mm
Height	—	112mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	75
Perf/Watt	0.3	101.6+33767%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon X1650 SE launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 and now averages $280. The Radeon X1650 SE costs 82.5% less ($231 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.4 (Radeon X1650 SE) vs 72.5 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 5078.6% better value. The Radeon X1650 SE is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).