Radeon X1650 SE vs MOBILITY RADEON X700

Radeon X1650 SE

2023Boost: 2581 MHz

MOBILITY RADEON X700

2010Core: 700 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Radeon X1650 SE

250

+6.0%

MOBILITY RADEON 9600/9700

MOBILITY RADEON 9800

Mobility Radeon HD 2300

Mobility Radeon HD 3410

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

0.0%

Mobility Radeon X1400

MOBILITY RADEON X600

Mobility Radeon HD 2300

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

Radeon R9 Fury

Radeon RX 5700

Radeon RX 6700

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON X700

#707

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

16204%

#709

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

14690%

#710

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

14651%

#714

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

13322%

#715

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

13231%

#717

MOBILITY RADEON X700

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

100%

#718

Mobility Radeon HD 4225

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

99%

#719

RADEON X800 SE

MSRP: $200|Avg: $15

97%

#720

MOBILITY RADEON 9700

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

82%

#721

Mobility Radeon HD 2300

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

76%

#722

GeForce 7800 GTX

MSRP: $599|Avg: $40

67%

#723

RADEON 9600SE

MSRP: $65|Avg: $65

63%

#724

Radeon X1200

MSRP: $80|Avg: $15

61%

#725

Radeon 2100

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

60%

#726

GeForce 6800

MSRP: $299|Avg: $50

57%

#727

Radeon 3100

MSRP: $199|Avg: $30

55%

#728

GeForce 6800 GT

MSRP: $399|Avg: $40

54%

#729

GeForce 7950 GX2

MSRP: $599|Avg: $80

51%

#730

MOBILITY RADEON X1800

MSRP: $399|Avg: $50

49%

#731

Mobility Radeon X1450

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

49%

#732

MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP

MSRP: $20|Avg: $5

45%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon X1650 SE is significantly newer (2023 vs 2010). The Radeon X1650 SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon X1650 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (512 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON X700.

Insight	Radeon X1650 SE	MOBILITY RADEON X700
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+6%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-6%)
Longevity	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+300%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The MOBILITY RADEON X700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $49 for the Radeon X1650 SE, it costs 59% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 131.2% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon X1650 SE	MOBILITY RADEON X700
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+131.2%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49)	✅More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon X1650 SE Benchmark Check

MOBILITY RADEON X700 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1650 SE and MOBILITY RADEON X700

Radeon X1650 SE

The Radeon X1650 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points. Launch price was $549.

MOBILITY RADEON X700

The MOBILITY RADEON X700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon X1650 SE scores 71 versus the MOBILITY RADEON X700's 67 — the Radeon X1650 SE leads by 6%. The Radeon X1650 SE is built on RDNA 2.0 while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 uses TeraScale 2, both on 7 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon X1650 SE) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X700).

Feature	Radeon X1650 SE	MOBILITY RADEON X700
G3D Mark Score	71+6%	67
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	7 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	2560+220%	800
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	160+300%	40

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon X1650 SE	MOBILITY RADEON X700
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon X1650 SE comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 has 128 MB. The Radeon X1650 SE offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Radeon X1650 SE	MOBILITY RADEON X700
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+300%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (Radeon X1650 SE) vs 9.0b (MOBILITY RADEON X700). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon X1650 SE	MOBILITY RADEON X700
DirectX	9.0c	9.0b
OpenGL	2.1	2.1
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon X1650 SE draws 250W versus the MOBILITY RADEON X700's 50W — a 133.3% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1650 SE) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Radeon X1650 SE	MOBILITY RADEON X700
TDP	250W	50W-80%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	0.3	1.3+333%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon X1650 SE launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 launched at $100 and now averages $20. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 costs 59.2% less ($29 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.4 (Radeon X1650 SE) vs 3.4 (MOBILITY RADEON X700) — the MOBILITY RADEON X700 offers 142.9% better value. The Radeon X1650 SE is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2010).