RADEON X600 SE vs FirePro 2450

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RADEON X600 SE is positioned at rank #354 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON X600 SE

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

14804%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

14222%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

14057%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

14033%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

14004%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

13924%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

13749%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

13698%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

13571%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

13535%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

13371%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

13343%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

13102%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

13094%

#337

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

16327%

#352

RADEON X700

MSRP: $149|Avg: $10

100%

#353

Radeon X1900 GT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $20

100%

#354

RADEON X600 SE

MSRP: $100|Avg: $5

100%

#355

GeForce G200

MSRP: $299|Avg: $15

92%

#356

RADEON X700 PRO

MSRP: $179|Avg: $30

86%

#357

GeForce 6500

MSRP: $100|Avg: $5

78%

#359

RADEON X800 GT

MSRP: $249|Avg: $15

69%

#360

GeForce 6600

MSRP: $270|Avg: $10

65%

#361

RADEON 9550

MSRP: $129|Avg: $30

55%

#362

Radeon X1600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $49

51%

#363

GeForce FX 5700LE

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

51%

#364

GeForce PCX 5750

MSRP: $150|Avg: $15

47%

#365

GeForce FX 5700

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

43%

#366

RADEON X800 XT

MSRP: $499|Avg: $20

41%

#367

RADEON X800 XL

MSRP: $349|Avg: $15

41%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON X600 SE is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The RADEON X600 SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro 2450 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro 2450 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON X600 SE.

Insight	RADEON X600 SE	FirePro 2450
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+4.1%)
Longevity	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The RADEON X600 SE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $5 versus $10 for the FirePro 2450, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 92.2% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	RADEON X600 SE	FirePro 2450
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+92.2%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($5)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($10)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RADEON X600 SE Benchmark Check

FirePro 2450 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X600 SE and FirePro 2450

RADEON X600 SE

The RADEON X600 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 8 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.

FirePro 2450

The FirePro 2450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The RADEON X600 SE scores 49 and the FirePro 2450 reaches 51 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON X600 SE is built on RDNA 2.0 while the FirePro 2450 uses GCN 1.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (RADEON X600 SE) vs 384 (FirePro 2450). Raw compute: 8.942 TFLOPS (RADEON X600 SE) vs 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro 2450).

Feature	RADEON X600 SE	FirePro 2450
G3D Mark Score	49	51+4%
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	7 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1792+367%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.942 TFLOPS+1528%	0.5491 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+700%	8
TMUs	112+367%	24
L1 Cache	512 KB+433%	96 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON X600 SE	FirePro 2450
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RADEON X600 SE) vs 0.25 MB (FirePro 2450) — the RADEON X600 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON X600 SE	FirePro 2450
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON X600 SE draws 132W versus the FirePro 2450's 150W — a 12.8% difference. The RADEON X600 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X600 SE) vs 350W (FirePro 2450). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	RADEON X600 SE	FirePro 2450
TDP	132W-12%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	—	170mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	60°C
Perf/Watt	0.4+33%	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON X600 SE launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $5, while the FirePro 2450 launched at $0 and now averages $10. The RADEON X600 SE costs 50% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.8 (RADEON X600 SE) vs 5.1 (FirePro 2450) — the RADEON X600 SE offers 92.2% better value. The RADEON X600 SE is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).