CPU
GPU
RADEON X600 SE
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 350M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON X600 SE is positioned at rank 354 and the Quadro FX 350M is on rank 228, so the Quadro FX 350M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X600 SE
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 350M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON X600 SE is significantly newer (2023 vs 2008). The RADEON X600 SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 350M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X600 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 350M.
| Insight | RADEON X600 SE | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+8.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-8.9%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RADEON X600 SE remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X600 SE and Quadro FX 350M
RADEON X600 SE
The RADEON X600 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 8 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.
Quadro FX 350M
The Quadro FX 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON X600 SE scores 49 versus the Quadro FX 350M's 45 — the RADEON X600 SE leads by 8.9%. The RADEON X600 SE is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Quadro FX 350M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (RADEON X600 SE) vs 240 (Quadro FX 350M). Raw compute: 8.942 TFLOPS (RADEON X600 SE) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 350M).
| Feature | RADEON X600 SE | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 49+9% | 45 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+647% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.942 TFLOPS+1337% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+40% | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X600 SE | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON X600 SE comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 350M has 256 MB. The RADEON X600 SE offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RADEON X600 SE) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 350M) — the RADEON X600 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON X600 SE | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X600 SE draws 132W versus the Quadro FX 350M's 189W — a 35.5% difference. The RADEON X600 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X600 SE) vs 350W (Quadro FX 350M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON X600 SE | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 132W-30% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4+100% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X600 SE is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2008).
| Feature | RADEON X600 SE | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5 | — |
| Codename | Navi 23 | GT200B |
| Release | December 8 2023 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #176 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON X600 SE and Quadro FX 350M
