RADEON X600 SE vs Quadro NVS 110M
RADEON X600 SE
Popular choices:
Quadro NVS 110M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON X600 SE is positioned at rank 354 and the Quadro NVS 110M is on rank 221, so the Quadro NVS 110M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X600 SE
Performance Per Dollar Quadro NVS 110M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON X600 SE is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The RADEON X600 SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro NVS 110M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X600 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro NVS 110M.
| Insight | RADEON X600 SE | Quadro NVS 110M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RADEON X600 SE remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X600 SE and Quadro NVS 110M
RADEON X600 SE
The RADEON X600 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 8 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.
Quadro NVS 110M
The Quadro NVS 110M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 48 points. Launch price was $109.94.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON X600 SE scores 49 and the Quadro NVS 110M reaches 48 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON X600 SE is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Quadro NVS 110M uses Kepler, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (RADEON X600 SE) vs 384 (Quadro NVS 110M). Raw compute: 8.942 TFLOPS (RADEON X600 SE) vs 0.5422 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 110M).
| Feature | RADEON X600 SE | Quadro NVS 110M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 49+2% | 48 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+367% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.942 TFLOPS+1549% | 0.5422 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 112+250% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+1500% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X600 SE | Quadro NVS 110M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RADEON X600 SE) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro NVS 110M) — the RADEON X600 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON X600 SE | Quadro NVS 110M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X600 SE draws 132W versus the Quadro NVS 110M's 45W — a 98.3% difference. The Quadro NVS 110M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X600 SE) vs 350W (Quadro NVS 110M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON X600 SE | Quadro NVS 110M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 132W | 45W-66% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4 | 1.1+175% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X600 SE is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | RADEON X600 SE | Quadro NVS 110M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5 | — |
| Codename | Navi 23 | GK107 |
| Release | December 8 2023 | July 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #176 | #856 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON X600 SE and Quadro NVS 110M
