
RADEON X600XT vs GeForce 9400M G

RADEON X600XT
Popular choices:

GeForce 9400M G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9400M G
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON X600XT uses modern memory architecture. The RADEON X600XT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 9400M G lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9400M G is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RADEON X600XT offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RADEON X600XT | GeForce 9400M G |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 9400M G offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $10 (vs $10), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 2.2% better value per dollar than the RADEON X600XT.
| Insight | RADEON X600XT | GeForce 9400M G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X600XT and GeForce 9400M G

RADEON X600XT
The RADEON X600XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 92 points. Launch price was $999.

GeForce 9400M G
The GeForce 9400M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 94 points.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON X600XT scores 92 and the GeForce 9400M G reaches 94 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON X600XT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce 9400M G uses Maxwell, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,120 (RADEON X600XT) vs 384 (GeForce 9400M G). Raw compute: 23.04 TFLOPS (RADEON X600XT) vs 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 9400M G). Boost clocks: 2250 MHz vs 1176 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON X600XT | GeForce 9400M G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 92 | 94+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 5120+1233% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 23.04 TFLOPS+2451% | 0.9032 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2250 MHz+91% | 1176 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+1500% | 8 |
| TMUs | 320+1233% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+426% | 0.19 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X600XT | GeForce 9400M G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON X600XT comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9400M G has 256 MB. The RADEON X600XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RADEON X600XT) vs 1 MB (GeForce 9400M G) — the RADEON X600XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON X600XT | GeForce 9400M G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X600XT draws 300W versus the GeForce 9400M G's 33W — a 160.4% difference. The GeForce 9400M G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X600XT) vs 350W (GeForce 9400M G). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON X600XT | GeForce 9400M G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 33W-89% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 2.8+833% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X600XT launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce 9400M G launched at $50 and now averages $10. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.2 (RADEON X600XT) vs 9.4 (GeForce 9400M G) — the GeForce 9400M G offers 2.2% better value. The RADEON X600XT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | RADEON X600XT | GeForce 9400M G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $10 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.2 | 9.4+2% |
| Codename | Navi 21 | GM108 |
| Release | October 28 2020 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #35 | #847 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















