RADEON X600XT vs RADEON X800 XT
RADEON X600XT
Popular choices:
RADEON X800 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X800 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X800 XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RADEON X600XT offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RADEON X600XT | RADEON X800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.5%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON X600XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $20 for the RADEON X800 XT, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 87.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON X600XT | RADEON X800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+87.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X600XT and RADEON X800 XT
RADEON X600XT
The RADEON X600XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 92 points. Launch price was $999.
RADEON X800 XT
The RADEON X800 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 98 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON X600XT scores 92 versus the RADEON X800 XT's 98 — the RADEON X800 XT leads by 6.5%. The RADEON X600XT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RADEON X800 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 5,120 (RADEON X600XT) vs 4,608 (RADEON X800 XT). Raw compute: 23.04 TFLOPS (RADEON X600XT) vs 20.74 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 XT). Boost clocks: 2250 MHz vs 2250 MHz. Ray tracing: 80 RT cores (RADEON X600XT) vs 72 (RADEON X800 XT).
| Feature | RADEON X600XT | RADEON X800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 92 | 98+7% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5120+11% | 4608 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 23.04 TFLOPS+11% | 20.74 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2250 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| ROPs | 128 | 128 |
| TMUs | 320+11% | 288 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 80+11% | 72 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X600XT | RADEON X800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON X600XT comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X800 XT has 256 MB. The RADEON X600XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | RADEON X600XT | RADEON X800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X600XT draws 300W versus the RADEON X800 XT's 300W — a 0% difference. The RADEON X800 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X600XT) vs 350W (RADEON X800 XT). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON X600XT | RADEON X800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X600XT launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the RADEON X800 XT launched at $499 and now averages $20. The RADEON X600XT costs 50% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.2 (RADEON X600XT) vs 4.9 (RADEON X800 XT) — the RADEON X600XT offers 87.8% better value.
| Feature | RADEON X600XT | RADEON X800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-50% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.2+88% | 4.9 |
| Codename | Navi 21 | Navi 21 |
| Release | October 28 2020 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #35 | #42 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON X600XT and RADEON X800 XT
