RADEON X600XT vs Quadro FX 370M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 370M

#339

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

15885%

#354

Quadro FX 370M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#355

FirePro 3D V5700

MSRP: $599|Avg: $25

98%

#356

Quadro FX 580

MSRP: $199|Avg: $500

98%

#358

GRID M60-1B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

97%

#359

FireStream 9270

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $20

96%

#360

Quadro 400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $500

95%

#361

FirePro 2260

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

95%

#362

Quadro FX 380 LP

MSRP: $169|Avg: $15

92%

#364

Quadro FX 1800

MSRP: $489|Avg: $100

87%

#365

FirePro 3D V8700

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1229

86%

#366

FirePro 3D V9800

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $80

86%

#367

Quadro 5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $100

85%

#368

FirePro V5700

MSRP: $599|Avg: $20

84%

#369

FirePro V9800

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $250

84%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON X600XT is significantly newer (2020 vs 2008). The RADEON X600XT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 370M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 370M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RADEON X600XT offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	RADEON X600XT	Quadro FX 370M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%)
Longevity	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 370M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RADEON X600XT Benchmark Check

Quadro FX 370M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X600XT and Quadro FX 370M

RADEON X600XT

The RADEON X600XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 92 points. Launch price was $999.

Quadro FX 370M

The Quadro FX 370M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 93 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The RADEON X600XT scores 92 and the Quadro FX 370M reaches 93 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON X600XT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Quadro FX 370M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 5,120 (RADEON X600XT) vs 240 (Quadro FX 370M). Raw compute: 23.04 TFLOPS (RADEON X600XT) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 370M).

Feature	RADEON X600XT	Quadro FX 370M
G3D Mark Score	92	93+1%
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	7 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	5120+2033%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	23.04 TFLOPS+3604%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	128+300%	32
TMUs	320+300%	80
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON X600XT	Quadro FX 370M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON X600XT comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 370M has 256 MB. The RADEON X600XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RADEON X600XT) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 370M) — the RADEON X600XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON X600XT	Quadro FX 370M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON X600XT draws 300W versus the Quadro FX 370M's 189W — a 45.4% difference. The Quadro FX 370M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X600XT) vs 350W (Quadro FX 370M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.