RADEON X600XT vs Quadro FX 360M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 360M

#393

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

86900%

#408

Quadro FX 360M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#409

Quadro FX 3500

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599

100%

#410

Quadro FX 1400

MSRP: $799|Avg: $30

94%

#411

GRID K1

MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120

94%

#413

GRID P4-1Q

MSRP: $5890|Avg: $185

71%

#416

GRID RTX6000-2Q

MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1500

59%

#417

GRID M60-0B

MSRP: $19900|Avg: $19900

53%

#418

Quadro FX 5500

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $30

47%

#419

Quadro FX 4500 X2

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

47%

#420

Quadro FX 1000

MSRP: $500|Avg: $30

41%

#421

Quadro FX 1300

MSRP: $599|Avg: $15

35%

#422

Quadro FX 3400/4400

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $50

35%

#423

Quadro FX 4000

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $50

29%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON X600XT is significantly newer (2020 vs 2008). The RADEON X600XT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 360M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RADEON X600XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 360M.

Insight	RADEON X600XT	Quadro FX 360M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+5.7%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.7%)
Longevity	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the RADEON X600XT remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RADEON X600XT Benchmark Check

Quadro FX 360M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X600XT and Quadro FX 360M

RADEON X600XT

The RADEON X600XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 92 points. Launch price was $999.

Quadro FX 360M

The Quadro FX 360M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 87 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON X600XT scores 92 versus the Quadro FX 360M's 87 — the RADEON X600XT leads by 5.7%. The RADEON X600XT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Quadro FX 360M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 5,120 (RADEON X600XT) vs 240 (Quadro FX 360M). Raw compute: 23.04 TFLOPS (RADEON X600XT) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 360M).

Feature	RADEON X600XT	Quadro FX 360M
G3D Mark Score	92+6%	87
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	7 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	5120+2033%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	23.04 TFLOPS+3604%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	128+300%	32
TMUs	320+300%	80
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON X600XT	Quadro FX 360M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON X600XT comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 360M has 256 MB. The RADEON X600XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RADEON X600XT) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 360M) — the RADEON X600XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON X600XT	Quadro FX 360M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON X600XT draws 300W versus the Quadro FX 360M's 189W — a 45.4% difference. The Quadro FX 360M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X600XT) vs 350W (Quadro FX 360M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.