
RADEON X700 PRO

Radeon X1650 GTO
RADEON X700 PRO vs Radeon X1650 GTO Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
RADEON X700 PRO vs Radeon X1650 GTO FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
RADEON X700 PRO vs Radeon X1650 GTO: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
RADEON X700 PRO
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 260W instead of 335W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌19.3% HIGHER MSRP$179 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Radeon X1650 GTO
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 17.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌28.8% higher power demand at 335W vs 260W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON X700 PRO vs Radeon X1650 GTO Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RADEON X700 PRO
The RADEON X700 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 27 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1287 MHz to 2245 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 76 points. Launch price was $549.

Radeon X1650 GTO
The Radeon X1650 GTO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1925 MHz to 2324 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 335W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 75 points. Launch price was $1,099.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON X700 PRO scores 76 and the Radeon X1650 GTO reaches 75 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON X700 PRO is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon X1650 GTO uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,120 (RADEON X700 PRO) vs 5,120 (Radeon X1650 GTO). Raw compute: 45.98 TFLOPS (RADEON X700 PRO) vs 23.8 TFLOPS (Radeon X1650 GTO). Boost clocks: 2245 MHz vs 2324 MHz. Ray tracing: 80 RT cores (RADEON X700 PRO) vs 80 (Radeon X1650 GTO).
| Feature | RADEON X700 PRO | Radeon X1650 GTO |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 76+1% | 75 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5120 | 5120 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 45.98 TFLOPS+93% | 23.8 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2245 MHz | 2324 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 160+25% | 128 |
| TMUs | 320 | 320 |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+150% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 80 | 80 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X700 PRO | Radeon X1650 GTO |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON X700 PRO has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1650 GTO carries 512 MB. Radeon X1650 GTO gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the RADEON X700 PRO and 64-bit on the Radeon X1650 GTO. L2 Cache: 6 MB (RADEON X700 PRO) vs 4 MB (Radeon X1650 GTO) — the RADEON X700 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON X700 PRO | Radeon X1650 GTO |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X700 PRO draws 260W versus the Radeon X1650 GTO's 335W — a 25.2% difference. The RADEON X700 PRO is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X700 PRO) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 GTO). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON X700 PRO | Radeon X1650 GTO |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W-22% | 335W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 170mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3+50% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the RADEON X700 PRO came in at $179, while the Radeon X1650 GTO launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon X1650 GTO was 16.2% cheaper ($29 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (RADEON X700 PRO) vs 0.5 (Radeon X1650 GTO) — the Radeon X1650 GTO offers 25% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X700 PRO (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | RADEON X700 PRO | Radeon X1650 GTO |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $179 | $150-16% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.4 | 0.5+25% |
| Codename | Navi 31 | Navi 21 |
| Release | July 27 2023 | May 10 2022 |
| Ranking | #29 | #25 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














