
Radeon HD 3200

RADEON X700 PRO
Radeon HD 3200 vs RADEON X700 PRO Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 3200 vs RADEON X700 PRO FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 3200 vs RADEON X700 PRO: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 3200
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $129 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 286.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Draws 186W instead of 260W, a 74W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 170mm, a 169mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
RADEON X700 PRO
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌258% HIGHER MSRP$179 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌39.8% higher power demand at 260W vs 186W.
- ❌16900% longer card at 170mm vs 1mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 3200 vs RADEON X700 PRO Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 3200
The Radeon HD 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 82 points. Launch price was $180.

RADEON X700 PRO
The RADEON X700 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 27 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1287 MHz to 2245 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 76 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 3200 scores 82 versus the RADEON X700 PRO's 76 — the Radeon HD 3200 leads by 7.9%. The Radeon HD 3200 is built on TeraScale 3 while the RADEON X700 PRO uses RDNA 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 3200) vs 5,120 (RADEON X700 PRO). Raw compute: 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3200) vs 45.98 TFLOPS (RADEON X700 PRO).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3200 | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 82+8% | 76 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 5120+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.92 TFLOPS | 45.98 TFLOPS+2295% |
| ROPs | 32 | 160+400% |
| TMUs | 80 | 320+300% |
| L1 Cache | 0.31 MB | 2.5 MB+706% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 6 MB+1100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 3200 | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 3200 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X700 PRO carries 256 MB. Radeon HD 3200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3200 and 64-bit on the RADEON X700 PRO. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 3200) vs 6 MB (RADEON X700 PRO) — the RADEON X700 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3200 | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 6 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (Radeon HD 3200) vs 9_0b (RADEON X700 PRO). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3200 | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0+11% | 9_0b |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 3200 draws 186W versus the RADEON X700 PRO's 260W — a 33.2% difference. The Radeon HD 3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 3200) vs 350W (RADEON X700 PRO). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy. Card length: 1mm vs 170mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3200 | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 186W-28% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Legacy |
| Length | 1mm | 170mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4+33% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon HD 3200 came in at $50, while the RADEON X700 PRO launched at $179. On MSRP, Radeon HD 3200 was 72.1% cheaper ($129 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (Radeon HD 3200) vs 0.4 (RADEON X700 PRO) — the Radeon HD 3200 offers 300% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X700 PRO (2023 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3200 | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-72% | $179 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.6+300% | 0.4 |
| Codename | Cayman | Navi 31 |
| Release | December 1 2011 | July 27 2023 |
| Ranking | #598 | #29 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














