Radeon HD 3200 vs RADEON X700 PRO

AMD

Radeon HD 3200

2011Core: 750 MHz
VS
AMD

RADEON X700 PRO

2023Core: 1287 MHzBoost: 2245 MHz

Radeon HD 3200 vs RADEON X700 PRO Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 3200 vs RADEON X700 PRO FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 3200 vs RADEON X700 PRO: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 3200

2011

Why buy it

  • Costs $129 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
  • Delivers 286.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Draws 186W instead of 260W, a 74W reduction.
  • Measures 1mm instead of 170mm, a 169mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

RADEON X700 PRO

2023

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 258% HIGHER MSRP
    $179 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • 39.8% higher power demand at 260W vs 186W.
  • 16900% longer card at 170mm vs 1mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 3200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 7.9% in PassMark G3D (82 vs 76), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON X700 PRO is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 40nm, 80 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2011. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 3200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $129 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $179, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 286.3% (1.6 vs 0.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 3200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON X700 PRO has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 3200 vs RADEON X700 PRO Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 3200

The Radeon HD 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 82 points. Launch price was $180.

AMD

RADEON X700 PRO

The RADEON X700 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 27 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1287 MHz to 2245 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 76 points. Launch price was $549.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 3200 scores 82 versus the RADEON X700 PRO's 76 — the Radeon HD 3200 leads by 7.9%. The Radeon HD 3200 is built on TeraScale 3 while the RADEON X700 PRO uses RDNA 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 3200) vs 5,120 (RADEON X700 PRO). Raw compute: 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3200) vs 45.98 TFLOPS (RADEON X700 PRO).

FeatureRadeon HD 3200RADEON X700 PRO
G3D Mark Score
82+8%
76
Architecture
TeraScale 3
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
40 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
1280
5120+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.92 TFLOPS
45.98 TFLOPS+2295%
ROPs
32
160+400%
TMUs
80
320+300%
L1 Cache
0.31 MB
2.5 MB+706%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
6 MB+1100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 3200RADEON X700 PRO
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 3200 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X700 PRO carries 256 MB. Radeon HD 3200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3200 and 64-bit on the RADEON X700 PRO. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 3200) vs 6 MB (RADEON X700 PRO) — the RADEON X700 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 3200RADEON X700 PRO
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
6 MB+1100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (Radeon HD 3200) vs 9_0b (RADEON X700 PRO). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon HD 3200RADEON X700 PRO
DirectX
10.0+11%
9_0b
Max Displays
2
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 3200 draws 186W versus the RADEON X700 PRO's 260W — a 33.2% difference. The Radeon HD 3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 3200) vs 350W (RADEON X700 PRO). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy. Card length: 1mm vs 170mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

FeatureRadeon HD 3200RADEON X700 PRO
TDP
186W-28%
260W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Legacy
Length
1mm
170mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Perf/Watt
0.4+33%
0.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 3200 came in at $50, while the RADEON X700 PRO launched at $179. On MSRP, Radeon HD 3200 was 72.1% cheaper ($129 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (Radeon HD 3200) vs 0.4 (RADEON X700 PRO) — the Radeon HD 3200 offers 300% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X700 PRO (2023 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon HD 3200RADEON X700 PRO
MSRP
$50-72%
$179
Performance per Dollar
1.6+300%
0.4
Codename
Cayman
Navi 31
Release
December 1 2011
July 27 2023
Ranking
#598
#29

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.