RADEON X700 SE vs Radeon X1650 GTO

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RADEON X700 SE vs Radeon X1650 GTO FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

RADEON X700 SE vs Radeon X1650 GTO: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RADEON X700 SE

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 335W, a 260W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Radeon X1650 GTO

2022

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌346.7% higher power demand at 335W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon X1650 GTO is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 5.6% in PassMark G3D (75 vs 71), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON X700 SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 7nm and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2022. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon X1650 GTO makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon X1650 GTO is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON X700 SE has the stronger long-term case.

RADEON X700 SE vs Radeon X1650 GTO Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RADEON X700 SE

The RADEON X700 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points.

Radeon X1650 GTO

The Radeon X1650 GTO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1925 MHz to 2324 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 335W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 75 points. Launch price was $1,099.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON X700 SE scores 71 versus the Radeon X1650 GTO's 75 — the Radeon X1650 GTO leads by 5.6%. The RADEON X700 SE is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon X1650 GTO uses RDNA 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (RADEON X700 SE) vs 5,120 (Radeon X1650 GTO). Raw compute: 15.77 TFLOPS (RADEON X700 SE) vs 23.8 TFLOPS (Radeon X1650 GTO). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 2324 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (RADEON X700 SE) vs 80 (Radeon X1650 GTO).

Feature	RADEON X700 SE	Radeon X1650 GTO
G3D Mark Score	71	75+6%
Architecture	RDNA 3.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	6 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	1792	5120+186%
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.77 TFLOPS	23.8 TFLOPS+51%
Boost Clock	2200 MHz	2324 MHz+6%
ROPs	64	128+100%
TMUs	112	320+186%
L1 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%
Ray Tracing Cores	28	80+186%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON X700 SE	Radeon X1650 GTO
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON X700 SE has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1650 GTO carries 512 MB. Radeon X1650 GTO gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the RADEON X700 SE and 64-bit on the Radeon X1650 GTO. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RADEON X700 SE) vs 4 MB (Radeon X1650 GTO) — the Radeon X1650 GTO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON X700 SE	Radeon X1650 GTO
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON X700 SE draws 75W versus the Radeon X1650 GTO's 335W — a 126.8% difference. The RADEON X700 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X700 SE) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 GTO). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	RADEON X700 SE	Radeon X1650 GTO
TDP	75W-78%	335W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	0.9+350%	0.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the RADEON X700 SE came in at $0, while the Radeon X1650 GTO launched at $150. On MSRP, RADEON X700 SE was 100+% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (RADEON X700 SE) vs 0.5 (Radeon X1650 GTO) — the RADEON X700 SE offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X700 SE (2023 vs 2022).

Feature	RADEON X700 SE	Radeon X1650 GTO
MSRP	$0-100%	$150
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	0.5
Codename	Navi 33	Navi 21
Release	January 4 2023	May 10 2022
Ranking	#139	#25

Search RADEON X700 SE on Amazon

Search Radeon X1650 GTO on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.