CPU
GPU
RADEON X800 SE
Popular choices:
GeForce 9200M GS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON X800 SE is positioned at rank 719 and the GeForce 9200M GS is on rank 683, so the GeForce 9200M GS offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X800 SE
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9200M GS
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON X800 SE is significantly newer (2025 vs 2016). The RADEON X800 SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 9200M GS lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X800 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9200M GS.
| Insight | RADEON X800 SE | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON X800 SE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $40 for the GeForce 9200M GS, it costs 63% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 168.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON X800 SE | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+168.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X800 SE and GeForce 9200M GS
RADEON X800 SE
The RADEON X800 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 130 points.
GeForce 9200M GS
The GeForce 9200M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 129 points.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON X800 SE scores 130 and the GeForce 9200M GS reaches 129 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON X800 SE is built on RDNA 3.5 while the GeForce 9200M GS uses Maxwell, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (RADEON X800 SE) vs 256 (GeForce 9200M GS). Raw compute: 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 SE) vs 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 9200M GS). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 993 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON X800 SE | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 130 | 129 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+900% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.85 TFLOPS+2821% | 0.5084 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+192% | 993 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+700% | 8 |
| TMUs | 160+567% | 24 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+700% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X800 SE | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (RADEON X800 SE) vs 1 MB (GeForce 9200M GS) — the RADEON X800 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON X800 SE | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+700% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9_0b (RADEON X800 SE) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9200M GS). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | RADEON X800 SE | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9_0b | 10.0+11% |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X800 SE draws 55W versus the GeForce 9200M GS's 16W — a 109.9% difference. The GeForce 9200M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X800 SE) vs 350W (GeForce 9200M GS). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 170mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | RADEON X800 SE | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W | 16W-71% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 170mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.4 | 8.1+238% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X800 SE launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce 9200M GS launched at $100 and now averages $40. The RADEON X800 SE costs 62.5% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.7 (RADEON X800 SE) vs 3.2 (GeForce 9200M GS) — the RADEON X800 SE offers 171.9% better value. The RADEON X800 SE is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2016).
| Feature | RADEON X800 SE | GeForce 9200M GS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $100-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-63% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.7+172% | 3.2 |
| Codename | Strix Halo | GM108 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | March 25 2016 |
| Ranking | #98 | #864 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON X800 SE and GeForce 9200M GS
