RADEON X800 SE vs GeForce G210M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON X800 SE is positioned at rank 719 and the GeForce G210M is on rank 436, so the GeForce G210M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON X800 SE

#709

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

16703%

#711

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

15142%

#712

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

15102%

#716

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

13732%

#717

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

13638%

#719

RADEON X800 SE

MSRP: $200|Avg: $15

100%

#720

MOBILITY RADEON 9700

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

85%

#721

Mobility Radeon HD 2300

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

78%

#722

GeForce 7800 GTX

MSRP: $599|Avg: $40

69%

#723

RADEON 9600SE

MSRP: $65|Avg: $65

65%

#724

Radeon X1200

MSRP: $80|Avg: $15

63%

#725

Radeon 2100

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

62%

#726

GeForce 6800

MSRP: $299|Avg: $50

58%

#727

Radeon 3100

MSRP: $199|Avg: $30

57%

#728

GeForce 6800 GT

MSRP: $399|Avg: $40

55%

#729

GeForce 7950 GX2

MSRP: $599|Avg: $80

52%

#730

Mobility Radeon X1450

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

51%

#731

MOBILITY RADEON X1800

MSRP: $399|Avg: $50

51%

#732

MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP

MSRP: $20|Avg: $5

46%

#733

MOBILITY RADEON 9550

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

46%

#734

GeForce 6200

MSRP: $129|Avg: $10

45%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce G210M

#426

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1683%

#428

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1526%

#429

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1522%

#433

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1384%

#434

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1374%

#436

GeForce G210M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#437

Radeon HD 8450G + 8750M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

99%

#438

Radeon R3

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

97%

#439

Radeon HD 7520G + HD 8600/8700M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

97%

#441

Radeon HD 8550G + 8600M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

96%

#443

Radeon R9 M360

MSRP: $300|Avg: $81

94%

#444

Radeon HD 8550G + 7600M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

93%

#445

Radeon R9 M365X

MSRP: $250|Avg: $50

92%

#446

GeForce 7800 GS

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

91%

#447

Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

91%

#448

Radeon R9 M265X

MSRP: $200|Avg: $30

91%

#449

Mobility Radeon HD 5165

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

90%

#450

Radeon R5 M435

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

89%

#451

Radeon E8860

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

87%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON X800 SE is significantly newer (2025 vs 2016). The RADEON X800 SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce G210M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RADEON X800 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce G210M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	RADEON X800 SE	GeForce G210M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%)
Longevity	RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the RADEON X800 SE remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RADEON X800 SE Benchmark Check

GeForce G210M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X800 SE and GeForce G210M

RADEON X800 SE

The RADEON X800 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 130 points.

GeForce G210M

The GeForce G210M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 129 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The RADEON X800 SE scores 130 and the GeForce G210M reaches 129 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON X800 SE is built on RDNA 3.5 while the GeForce G210M uses Maxwell, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (RADEON X800 SE) vs 256 (GeForce G210M). Raw compute: 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 SE) vs 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce G210M). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 993 MHz.

Feature	RADEON X800 SE	GeForce G210M
G3D Mark Score	130	129
Architecture	RDNA 3.5	Maxwell
Process Node	4 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2560+900%	256
Compute (TFLOPS)	14.85 TFLOPS+2821%	0.5084 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2900 MHz+192%	993 MHz
ROPs	64+700%	8
TMUs	160+567%	24
L2 Cache	8 MB+700%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON X800 SE	GeForce G210M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON X800 SE comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce G210M has 512 MB. The GeForce G210M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (RADEON X800 SE) vs 1 MB (GeForce G210M) — the RADEON X800 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON X800 SE	GeForce G210M
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	8 MB+700%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9_0b (RADEON X800 SE) vs 10.1 (GeForce G210M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

Feature	RADEON X800 SE	GeForce G210M
DirectX	9_0b	10.1+12%
Max Displays	2+100%	1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON X800 SE draws 55W versus the GeForce G210M's 16W — a 109.9% difference. The GeForce G210M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X800 SE) vs 350W (GeForce G210M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 170mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.