
RADEON X800 SE vs Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU

RADEON X800 SE
Popular choices:

Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RADEON X800 SE is positioned at rank #719 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X800 SE
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON X800 SE is significantly newer (2025 vs 2018). The RADEON X800 SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X800 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (256 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU.
| Insight | RADEON X800 SE | Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RADEON X800 SE remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X800 SE and Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU

RADEON X800 SE
The RADEON X800 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 130 points.
Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 129 points.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON X800 SE scores 130 and the Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU reaches 129 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | RADEON X800 SE | Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 130 | 129 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 7 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X800 SE | Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON X800 SE comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU has 0 MB. The RADEON X800 SE offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | RADEON X800 SE | Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9_0b (RADEON X800 SE) vs 12_1 (Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | RADEON X800 SE | Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9_0b | 12_1+33% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X800 SE draws 55W versus the Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU's 7W — a 154.8% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X800 SE) vs 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU). Power connectors: Legacy vs Integrated. Card length: 170mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | RADEON X800 SE | Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W | 7W-87% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Integrated |
| Length | 170mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 2.4 | 18.4+667% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X800 SE launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.7 (RADEON X800 SE) vs Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU) — the Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU offers Infinity% better value. The RADEON X800 SE is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2018).
| Feature | RADEON X800 SE | Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.7 | Infinity |
| Codename | Strix Halo | — |
| Release | January 6 2025 | December 6 2018 |
| Ranking | #98 | #915 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















