RADEON X800 SE vs GeForce RTX 4070
RADEON X800 SE
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RADEON X800 SE is positioned at rank #719 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X800 SE
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 20606.9% higher G3D Mark score and 4700% more VRAM (12 GB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON X800 SE.
| Insight | RADEON X800 SE | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-20606.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+20606.9%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $550 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 464.7% better value per dollar than the RADEON X800 SE.
| Insight | RADEON X800 SE | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+464.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($550) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X800 SE and GeForce RTX 4070
RADEON X800 SE
The RADEON X800 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 130 points.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON X800 SE scores 130 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 20606.9%. The RADEON X800 SE is built on RDNA 3.5 while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (RADEON X800 SE) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 SE) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 2475 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (RADEON X800 SE) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 184.
| Feature | RADEON X800 SE | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 130 | 26,919+20607% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 5888+130% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.85 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+96% |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+17% | 2475 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 184+15% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | 36 MB+350% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 46+15% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RADEON X800 SE lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RADEON X800 SE | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON X800 SE comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 4700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (RADEON X800 SE) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON X800 SE | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 12 GB+4700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | 36 MB+350% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9_0b (RADEON X800 SE) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | RADEON X800 SE | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9_0b | 12.2+36% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X800 SE draws 55W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 113.7% difference. The RADEON X800 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X800 SE) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Card length: 170mm vs 304mm, occupying 1 vs 3 slots.
| Feature | RADEON X800 SE | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-73% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 8-pin |
| Length | 170mm | 304mm |
| Height | — | 137mm |
| Slots | 1-67% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.4 | 134.6+5508% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X800 SE launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 and now averages $550. The RADEON X800 SE costs 97.3% less ($535 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.7 (RADEON X800 SE) vs 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 462.1% better value. The RADEON X800 SE is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | RADEON X800 SE | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200-67% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-97% | $550 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.7 | 48.9+462% |
| Codename | Strix Halo | AD104 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #98 | #32 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON X800 SE and GeForce RTX 4070
