Radeon Xpress 1300 vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 15032.7% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Xpress 1300.

Insight	Radeon Xpress 1300	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-15032.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+15032.7%)
Longevity	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 9786.7% better value per dollar than the Radeon Xpress 1300.

Insight	Radeon Xpress 1300	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+9786.7%)
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($49)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Xpress 1300 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Xpress 1300 and GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon Xpress 1300

The Radeon Xpress 1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon Xpress 1300 scores 52 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 15032.7%. The Radeon Xpress 1300 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Xpress 1300) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 4.224 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1300) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Xpress 1300	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	52	7,869+15033%
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Turing
Process Node	7 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1280+43%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.224 TFLOPS+42%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1650 MHz	1665 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80+43%	56
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Xpress 1300	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Xpress 1300 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Xpress 1300) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Radeon Xpress 1300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Xpress 1300	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (Radeon Xpress 1300) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.4. OpenGL: 2.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.

Feature	Radeon Xpress 1300	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	9.0c	12+33%
Vulkan	N/A	1.4
OpenGL	2.0	4.6+130%
Max Displays	1	3+200%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Radeon Xpress 1300) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: Avivo vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (Radeon Xpress 1300) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	Radeon Xpress 1300	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	None	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	Avivo	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	MPEG-2	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Xpress 1300 draws 85W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 12.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Xpress 1300) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 70°C.

Feature	Radeon Xpress 1300	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	85W	75W-12%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	0mm	229mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	75	70°C-7%
Perf/Watt	0.6	104.9+17383%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Xpress 1300 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The Radeon Xpress 1300 costs 34.7% less ($26 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.1 (Radeon Xpress 1300) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 9436.4% better value. The Radeon Xpress 1300 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).