CPU
GPU
RADEON XPRESS 200M
Popular choices:
GeForce FX Go5650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON XPRESS 200M is positioned at rank 225 and the GeForce FX Go5650 is on rank 334, so the RADEON XPRESS 200M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON XPRESS 200M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX Go5650
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON XPRESS 200M is significantly newer (2020 vs 2011). The RADEON XPRESS 200M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce FX Go5650 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON XPRESS 200M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 35.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX Go5650.
| Insight | RADEON XPRESS 200M | GeForce FX Go5650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+35.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-35.3%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RADEON XPRESS 200M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON XPRESS 200M and GeForce FX Go5650
RADEON XPRESS 200M
The RADEON XPRESS 200M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23 points.
GeForce FX Go5650
The GeForce FX Go5650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON XPRESS 200M scores 23 versus the GeForce FX Go5650's 17 — the RADEON XPRESS 200M leads by 35.3%. The RADEON XPRESS 200M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce FX Go5650 uses Rankine, both on 7 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (RADEON XPRESS 200M) vs 336 (GeForce FX Go5650). Raw compute: 5.274 TFLOPS (RADEON XPRESS 200M) vs 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go5650).
| Feature | RADEON XPRESS 200M | GeForce FX Go5650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 23+35% | 17 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Rankine |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+662% | 336 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.274 TFLOPS+384% | 1.089 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+186% | 56 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON XPRESS 200M | GeForce FX Go5650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RADEON XPRESS 200M) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce FX Go5650) — the RADEON XPRESS 200M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON XPRESS 200M | GeForce FX Go5650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9_0 (RADEON XPRESS 200M) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX Go5650). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | RADEON XPRESS 200M | GeForce FX Go5650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9_0 | 9.0a |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (RADEON XPRESS 200M) vs VPE 3.0 (GeForce FX Go5650). Decoder: MPEG-2 vs VPE 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (RADEON XPRESS 200M) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce FX Go5650).
| Feature | RADEON XPRESS 200M | GeForce FX Go5650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VPE 3.0 |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 | VPE 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON XPRESS 200M draws 50W versus the GeForce FX Go5650's 150W — a 100% difference. The RADEON XPRESS 200M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON XPRESS 200M) vs 350W (GeForce FX Go5650). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON XPRESS 200M | GeForce FX Go5650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-67% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5+400% | 0.1 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON XPRESS 200M and GeForce FX Go5650
