
RADEON XPRESS 200M vs RADEON 9600SE

RADEON XPRESS 200M
Popular choices:

RADEON 9600SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON XPRESS 200M is positioned at rank 225 and the RADEON 9600SE is on rank 723, so the RADEON XPRESS 200M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON XPRESS 200M
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9600SE
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON 9600SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 17.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON XPRESS 200M.
| Insight | RADEON XPRESS 200M | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-17.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+17.4%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RADEON 9600SE remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON XPRESS 200M and RADEON 9600SE

RADEON XPRESS 200M
The RADEON XPRESS 200M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23 points.

RADEON 9600SE
The RADEON 9600SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON XPRESS 200M scores 23 versus the RADEON 9600SE's 27 — the RADEON 9600SE leads by 17.4%. The RADEON XPRESS 200M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RADEON 9600SE uses RDNA 3.5, both on 7 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (RADEON XPRESS 200M) vs 2,560 (RADEON 9600SE). Raw compute: 5.274 TFLOPS (RADEON XPRESS 200M) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9600SE). Boost clocks: 1030 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON XPRESS 200M | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 23 | 27+17% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.274 TFLOPS | 14.85 TFLOPS+182% |
| Boost Clock | 1030 MHz | 2900 MHz+182% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 160 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON XPRESS 200M | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RADEON XPRESS 200M) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9600SE) — the RADEON 9600SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON XPRESS 200M | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9_0 (RADEON XPRESS 200M) vs 9.0 (RADEON 9600SE). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | RADEON XPRESS 200M | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9_0 | 9.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (RADEON XPRESS 200M) vs None (RADEON 9600SE). Decoder: MPEG-2 vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (RADEON XPRESS 200M) vs MPEG-2 (RADEON 9600SE).
| Feature | RADEON XPRESS 200M | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON XPRESS 200M draws 50W versus the RADEON 9600SE's 55W — a 9.5% difference. The RADEON XPRESS 200M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON XPRESS 200M) vs 350W (RADEON 9600SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON XPRESS 200M | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-9% | 55W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 60 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON 9600SE is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | RADEON XPRESS 200M | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $65 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $65 |
| Codename | Navi 12 | Strix Halo |
| Release | June 15 2020 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #283 | #98 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















