CPU
GPU
RADEON XPRESS 200M
Popular choices:
MOBILITY RADEON 9550
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON XPRESS 200M is positioned at rank 225 and the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is on rank 732, so the RADEON XPRESS 200M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON XPRESS 200M
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 9550
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON XPRESS 200M is significantly newer (2020 vs 2010). The RADEON XPRESS 200M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 30.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RADEON XPRESS 200M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RADEON XPRESS 200M | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-30.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+30.4%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+693.7%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON XPRESS 200M and MOBILITY RADEON 9550
RADEON XPRESS 200M
The RADEON XPRESS 200M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23 points.
MOBILITY RADEON 9550
The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON XPRESS 200M scores 23 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9550's 30 — the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 leads by 30.4%. The RADEON XPRESS 200M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 uses TeraScale 2, both on 7 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (RADEON XPRESS 200M) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550). Raw compute: 5.274 TFLOPS (RADEON XPRESS 200M) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9550).
| Feature | RADEON XPRESS 200M | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 23 | 30+30% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+220% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.274 TFLOPS+371% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 160+300% | 40 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON XPRESS 200M | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON XPRESS 200M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 has 65 MB. The RADEON XPRESS 200M offers 693.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RADEON XPRESS 200M) vs 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) — the RADEON XPRESS 200M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON XPRESS 200M | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+694% | 0.063 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9_0 (RADEON XPRESS 200M) vs 9.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | RADEON XPRESS 200M | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9_0 | 9.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON XPRESS 200M draws 50W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9550's 50W — a 0% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON XPRESS 200M) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9550). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON XPRESS 200M | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 0.6+20% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON XPRESS 200M is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2010).
| Feature | RADEON XPRESS 200M | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $10 |
| Codename | Navi 12 | Broadway |
| Release | June 15 2020 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #283 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON XPRESS 200M and MOBILITY RADEON 9550
