RADEON XPRESS 200M vs Radeon 9550 / X1050

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RADEON XPRESS 200M is positioned at rank #225 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON XPRESS 200M

#94

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $4799

96%

#96

L4

MSRP: $2345|Avg: $1800

94%

#97

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6799|Avg: $5500

91%

#98

RTX 5880 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $6000

91%

#99

Tesla M40

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1099

89%

#100

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499

82%

#101

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition

MSRP: $11605|Avg: $8199

79%

#210

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

3212%

#225

RADEON XPRESS 200M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#226

FirePro D500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

99%

#227

FirePro 3D V4800

MSRP: $189|Avg: $20

98%

#231

GRID T4-2Q

MSRP: $845|Avg: $600

94%

#238

FirePro 3D V3800

MSRP: $129|Avg: $12

80%

#240

Quadro K600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

79%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon 9550 / X1050 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 26.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON XPRESS 200M.

Insight	RADEON XPRESS 200M	Radeon 9550 / X1050
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-26.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+26.1%)
Longevity	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 9550 / X1050 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RADEON XPRESS 200M Benchmark Check

Radeon 9550 / X1050 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON XPRESS 200M and Radeon 9550 / X1050

RADEON XPRESS 200M

The RADEON XPRESS 200M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23 points.

Radeon 9550 / X1050

The Radeon 9550 / X1050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON XPRESS 200M scores 23 versus the Radeon 9550 / X1050's 29 — the Radeon 9550 / X1050 leads by 26.1%. The RADEON XPRESS 200M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon 9550 / X1050 uses GCN 4.0, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (RADEON XPRESS 200M) vs 512 (Radeon 9550 / X1050). Raw compute: 5.274 TFLOPS (RADEON XPRESS 200M) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 9550 / X1050). Boost clocks: 1030 MHz vs 1218 MHz.

Feature	RADEON XPRESS 200M	Radeon 9550 / X1050
G3D Mark Score	23	29+26%
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	7 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2560+400%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.274 TFLOPS+323%	1.247 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1030 MHz	1218 MHz+18%
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	160+400%	32
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON XPRESS 200M	Radeon 9550 / X1050
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RADEON XPRESS 200M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon 9550 / X1050) — the RADEON XPRESS 200M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON XPRESS 200M	Radeon 9550 / X1050
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9_0 (RADEON XPRESS 200M) vs 9_0 (Radeon 9550 / X1050). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	RADEON XPRESS 200M	Radeon 9550 / X1050
DirectX	9_0	9_0
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON XPRESS 200M draws 50W versus the Radeon 9550 / X1050's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon 9550 / X1050 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON XPRESS 200M) vs 350W (Radeon 9550 / X1050). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.