RADEON XPRESS 200M vs GeForce Go 6400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON XPRESS 200M is positioned at rank 225 and the GeForce Go 6400 is on rank 338, so the RADEON XPRESS 200M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON XPRESS 200M

#94

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $4799

96%

#96

L4

MSRP: $2345|Avg: $1800

94%

#97

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6799|Avg: $5500

91%

#98

RTX 5880 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $6000

91%

#99

Tesla M40

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1099

89%

#100

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499

82%

#101

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition

MSRP: $11605|Avg: $8199

79%

#210

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

3212%

#225

RADEON XPRESS 200M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#226

FirePro D500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

99%

#227

FirePro 3D V4800

MSRP: $189|Avg: $20

98%

#231

GRID T4-2Q

MSRP: $845|Avg: $600

94%

#238

FirePro 3D V3800

MSRP: $129|Avg: $12

80%

#240

Quadro K600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

79%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 6400

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

9068%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

8711%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

8610%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

8595%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

8578%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

8529%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

8421%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

8390%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

8313%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

8290%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

8190%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

8172%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

8025%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

8020%

#323

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

10000%

#338

GeForce Go 6400

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#339

Radeon X1950 GT

MSRP: $140|Avg: $49

95%

#340

GeForce 6600 GT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $50

90%

#341

RADEON X600 PRO

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

85%

#342

Radeon X1600 Pro

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

83%

#343

RADEON X300SE

MSRP: $60|Avg: $60

79%

#345

RADEON X800 GTO

MSRP: $199|Avg: $199

72%

#346

Radeon X1600 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

72%

#347

Radeon X1300

MSRP: $100|Avg: $49

72%

#348

Radeon X1800 GTO

MSRP: $249|Avg: $20

71%

#349

GeForce 7800 GT

MSRP: $449|Avg: $20

68%

#351

RADEON E2400

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

65%

#352

Radeon X1650 GTO

MSRP: $150|Avg: $20

63%

#353

RADEON X800GT

MSRP: $160|Avg: $10

63%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON XPRESS 200M is significantly newer (2020 vs 2012). The RADEON XPRESS 200M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce Go 6400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce Go 6400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RADEON XPRESS 200M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	RADEON XPRESS 200M	GeForce Go 6400
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+4.3%)
Longevity	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+3025%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 6400 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RADEON XPRESS 200M Benchmark Check

GeForce Go 6400 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON XPRESS 200M and GeForce Go 6400

RADEON XPRESS 200M

The RADEON XPRESS 200M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23 points.

GeForce Go 6400

The GeForce Go 6400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24 points. Launch price was $99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The RADEON XPRESS 200M scores 23 and the GeForce Go 6400 reaches 24 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON XPRESS 200M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce Go 6400 uses Kepler, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (RADEON XPRESS 200M) vs 384 (GeForce Go 6400). Raw compute: 5.274 TFLOPS (RADEON XPRESS 200M) vs 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6400).

Feature	RADEON XPRESS 200M	GeForce Go 6400
G3D Mark Score	23	24+4%
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Kepler
Process Node	7 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2560+567%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.274 TFLOPS+661%	0.6927 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	160+400%	32
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON XPRESS 200M	GeForce Go 6400
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON XPRESS 200M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 6400 has 16 MB. The RADEON XPRESS 200M offers 3025% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RADEON XPRESS 200M) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce Go 6400) — the RADEON XPRESS 200M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON XPRESS 200M	GeForce Go 6400
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+3025%	0.016 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9_0 (RADEON XPRESS 200M) vs 10.0 (GeForce Go 6400). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

Feature	RADEON XPRESS 200M	GeForce Go 6400
DirectX	9_0	10.0+11%
Max Displays	2+100%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (RADEON XPRESS 200M) vs No (GeForce Go 6400). Decoder: MPEG-2 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (RADEON XPRESS 200M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce Go 6400).

Feature	RADEON XPRESS 200M	GeForce Go 6400
Encoder	None	No
Decoder	MPEG-2	PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON XPRESS 200M draws 50W versus the GeForce Go 6400's 65W — a 26.1% difference. The RADEON XPRESS 200M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON XPRESS 200M) vs 350W (GeForce Go 6400). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.