RadeonT 660M vs FirePro V7900

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RadeonT 660M is positioned at rank 226 and the FirePro V7900 is on rank 279, so the RadeonT 660M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RadeonT 660M

#53

Radeon RX 6850M XT

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

97%

#216

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

484%

#218

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

439%

#219

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

438%

#223

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

398%

#224

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

395%

#226

RadeonT 660M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#228

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition

MSRP: $149|Avg: $40

99%

#230

Maxwell GPU Surface Book

MSRP: $150|Avg: $75

98%

#235

Radeon RX 540

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

96%

#236

Radeon HD 6750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60

95%

#237

Radeon HD 7570M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $15

94%

#239

Arc Graphics 130T

MSRP: $300|Avg: $250

92%

#240

GeForce MX570 A

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro V7900

#110

Quadro GV100

MSRP: $8999|Avg: $8999

93%

#111

Tesla P40

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $150

92%

#112

GRID RTX6000-1Q

MSRP: $6299|Avg: $1500

88%

#113

Quadro RTX 8000

MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9999

88%

#264

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

6537%

#279

FirePro V7900

MSRP: $999|Avg: $120

100%

#280

GRID P6-4Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150

98%

#281

GRID M60-8A

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

98%

#283

Quadro K4000

MSRP: $1269|Avg: $100

95%

#285

GRID P4-2Q

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $235

93%

#287

Tesla C2070

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $38

92%

#289

Quadro 2000 D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $35

92%

#290

FirePro V5900

MSRP: $599|Avg: $15

91%

#291

FirePro S9000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $156

89%

#294

GRID P40-4Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RadeonT 660M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2011). The RadeonT 660M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro V7900 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro V7900 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RadeonT 660M.

Insight	RadeonT 660M	FirePro V7900
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%)
Longevity	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	Standard Size (279mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro V7900 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RadeonT 660M Benchmark Check

FirePro V7900 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RadeonT 660M and FirePro V7900

RadeonT 660M

The RadeonT 660M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,221 points.

FirePro V7900

The FirePro V7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,261 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The RadeonT 660M scores 2,221 and the FirePro V7900 reaches 2,261 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RadeonT 660M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the FirePro V7900 uses TeraScale 3, both on 6 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (RadeonT 660M) vs 1,280 (FirePro V7900). Raw compute: 1.459 TFLOPS (RadeonT 660M) vs 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V7900).

Feature	RadeonT 660M	FirePro V7900
G3D Mark Score	2,221	2,261+2%
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	TeraScale 3
Process Node	6 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	1280+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.459 TFLOPS	1.856 TFLOPS+27%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	80+233%
L1 Cache	128 KB	320 KB+150%
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RadeonT 660M	FirePro V7900
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RadeonT 660M) vs 0.5 MB (FirePro V7900) — the RadeonT 660M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RadeonT 660M	FirePro V7900
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (RadeonT 660M) vs 11.2 (FirePro V7900). Vulkan: 1.3 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	RadeonT 660M	FirePro V7900
DirectX	12 (12_2)+7%	11.2
Vulkan	1.3	None
OpenGL	4.6+5%	4.4
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (RadeonT 660M) vs None (FirePro V7900). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs UVD 3.1. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG (RadeonT 660M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro V7900).

Feature	RadeonT 660M	FirePro V7900
Encoder	VCN 3.0	None
Decoder	VCN 3.0	UVD 3.1
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RadeonT 660M draws 40W versus the FirePro V7900's 150W — a 115.8% difference. The RadeonT 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RadeonT 660M) vs 350W (FirePro V7900). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	RadeonT 660M	FirePro V7900
TDP	40W-73%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	279mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	100°C
Perf/Watt	55.5+268%	15.1