RadeonT 660M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200

RadeonT 660M

2023Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 1900 MHz

Radeon Pro WX 3200

2019Core: 1082 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

RadeonT 660M

2,221

+0.5%

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

Radeon Pro WX 3200

2,209

0.0%

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RadeonT 660M is positioned at rank 226 and the Radeon Pro WX 3200 is on rank 131, so the Radeon Pro WX 3200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RadeonT 660M

#53

Radeon RX 6850M XT

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

97%

#216

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

484%

#218

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

439%

#219

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

438%

#223

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

398%

#224

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

395%

#226

RadeonT 660M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#228

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition

MSRP: $149|Avg: $40

99%

#230

Maxwell GPU Surface Book

MSRP: $150|Avg: $75

98%

#235

Radeon RX 540

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

96%

#236

Radeon HD 6750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60

95%

#237

Radeon HD 7570M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $15

94%

#239

GeForce MX570 A

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

92%

#240

Arc Graphics 130T

MSRP: $300|Avg: $250

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 3200

#66

Radeon PRO W7800

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200

98%

#67

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450

93%

#116

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1331%

#131

Radeon Pro WX 3200

MSRP: $199|Avg: $199

100%

#132

Radeon Pro WX 5100

MSRP: $499|Avg: $120

99%

#134

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

96%

#135

Quadro P3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $200

96%

#136

Quadro P3000

MSRP: $600|Avg: $80

96%

#139

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $120

90%

#140

Radeon Pro V520

MSRP: $800|Avg: $300

90%

#141

Quadro M5500

MSRP: $800|Avg: $200

89%

#142

Quadro K1200

MSRP: $300|Avg: $184

89%

#143

Quadro P400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $60

88%

#144

Radeon Pro WX 7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $180

87%

#145

Quadro M520

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

86%

#146

Radeon Sky 500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

85%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RadeonT 660M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 3200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	RadeonT 660M	Radeon Pro WX 3200
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)
Longevity	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the RadeonT 660M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RadeonT 660M Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX 3200 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RadeonT 660M and Radeon Pro WX 3200

RadeonT 660M

The RadeonT 660M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,221 points.

Radeon Pro WX 3200

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The RadeonT 660M scores 2,221 and the Radeon Pro WX 3200 reaches 2,209 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RadeonT 660M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses GCN 4.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (RadeonT 660M) vs 640 (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Raw compute: 1.459 TFLOPS (RadeonT 660M) vs 1.385 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3200).

Feature	RadeonT 660M	Radeon Pro WX 3200
G3D Mark Score	2,221	2,209
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	6 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.459 TFLOPS+5%	1.385 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	24	32+33%
L1 Cache	128 KB	160 KB+25%
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RadeonT 660M	Radeon Pro WX 3200
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RadeonT 660M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RadeonT 660M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon Pro WX 3200) — the RadeonT 660M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RadeonT 660M	Radeon Pro WX 3200
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (RadeonT 660M) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	RadeonT 660M	Radeon Pro WX 3200
DirectX	12 (12_2)	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (RadeonT 660M) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG (RadeonT 660M) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 3200).

Feature	RadeonT 660M	Radeon Pro WX 3200
Encoder	VCN 3.0	VCE 3.4 (Polaris)
Decoder	VCN 3.0	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG	H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RadeonT 660M draws 40W versus the Radeon Pro WX 3200's 65W — a 47.6% difference. The RadeonT 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RadeonT 660M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	RadeonT 660M	Radeon Pro WX 3200
TDP	40W-38%	65W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	168mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	82°C
Perf/Watt	55.5+63%	34.0