RadeonT 660M vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RadeonT 660M is positioned at rank #226 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RadeonT 660M

#53

Radeon RX 6850M XT

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

97%

#216

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

484%

#218

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

439%

#219

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

438%

#223

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

398%

#224

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

395%

#226

RadeonT 660M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#228

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition

MSRP: $149|Avg: $40

99%

#230

Maxwell GPU Surface Book

MSRP: $150|Avg: $75

98%

#235

Radeon RX 540

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

96%

#236

Radeon HD 6750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60

95%

#237

Radeon HD 7570M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $15

94%

#239

GeForce MX570 A

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

92%

#240

Arc Graphics 130T

MSRP: $300|Avg: $250

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RadeonT 660M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs.

Insight	RadeonT 660M	UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%)
Longevity	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm)	Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (14nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the RadeonT 660M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RadeonT 660M Benchmark Check

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RadeonT 660M and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

RadeonT 660M

The RadeonT 660M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,221 points.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,200 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The RadeonT 660M scores 2,221 and the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs reaches 2,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RadeonT 660M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs uses Gen. 12, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (RadeonT 660M) vs 32 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs). Boost clocks: 1900 MHz vs 1450 MHz.

Feature	RadeonT 660M	UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
G3D Mark Score	2,221	2,200
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Gen. 12
Process Node	6 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384+1100%	32
Boost Clock	1900 MHz+31%	1450 MHz

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RadeonT 660M	UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RadeonT 660M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs has 0 MB. The RadeonT 660M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

Feature	RadeonT 660M	UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RadeonT 660M draws 40W versus the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs's 15W — a 90.9% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RadeonT 660M) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.