GeForce GTX 460 vs RadeonT 660M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 460 vs RadeonT 660M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 460 vs RadeonT 660M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 460

2010

Why buy it

✅43.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 768 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 768 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌300% higher power demand at 160W vs 40W.

RadeonT 660M

2023

Why buy it

✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 768 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 40W instead of 160W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 460 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 460 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 43.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (2,275 vs 2,221), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RadeonT 660M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 768 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 40nm, and 6 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 460 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 460 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RadeonT 660M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 460 vs RadeonT 660M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 460

The GeForce GTX 460 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,275 points. Launch price was $229.

RadeonT 660M

The RadeonT 660M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,221 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 460 scores 2,275 and the RadeonT 660M reaches 2,221 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 is built on Fermi while the RadeonT 660M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 460) vs 384 (RadeonT 660M). Raw compute: 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460) vs 1.459 TFLOPS (RadeonT 660M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	RadeonT 660M
G3D Mark Score	2,275+2%	2,221
Architecture	Fermi	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	336	384+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9072 TFLOPS	1.459 TFLOPS+61%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56+133%	24
L1 Cache	448 KB+250%	128 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 460 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RadeonT 660M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	RadeonT 660M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 460 has 768 MB of VRAM, while the RadeonT 660M carries 2 GB. RadeonT 660M gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460 and 64-bit on the RadeonT 660M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 460) vs 2 MB (RadeonT 660M) — the RadeonT 660M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	RadeonT 660M
VRAM Capacity	0.75 GB	2 GB+167%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 460) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG (RadeonT 660M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	RadeonT 660M
Encoder	—	VCN 3.0
Decoder	—	VCN 3.0
Codecs	H.264	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 460 draws 160W versus the RadeonT 660M's 40W — a 120% difference. The RadeonT 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460) vs 350W (RadeonT 660M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	RadeonT 660M
TDP	160W	40W-75%
Recommended PSU	450W	350W-22%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	14.2	55.5+291%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RadeonT 660M (2023 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	RadeonT 660M
MSRP	$199	—
Codename	GF104	Rembrandt+
Release	July 12 2010	January 3 2023
Ranking	#652	#565

Search GeForce GTX 460 on Amazon

Search RadeonT 660M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.