G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 460

2010

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 768 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 768 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌300% higher power demand at 160W vs 40W.

RadeonT 660M

2023

Why buy it

✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 768 MB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 40W instead of 160W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 460

2010

RadeonT 660M

2023

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Why buy it

✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 768 MB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 40W instead of 160W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 768 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 768 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌300% higher power demand at 160W vs 40W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 460 better than RadeonT 660M?

Yes. GeForce GTX 460 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 2,275 vs 2,221 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 460 is a 2010 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while RadeonT 660M is a 2023 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RadeonT 660M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2010, more VRAM at 2 GB instead of 768 MB, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 6nm process instead of 40nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 460 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $199 MSRP. GeForce GTX 460 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce GTX 460 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $199 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 2.4% higher G3D Mark. RadeonT 660M is the newer 2023 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (40W vs 160W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does RadeonT 660M make more sense than GeForce GTX 460?

Yes. RadeonT 660M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (40W vs 160W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 460. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 460 currently gives you 2.4% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 460 Benchmark Check

RadeonT 660M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 460	RadeonT 660M
1080p
low	41 FPS	43 FPS
medium	33 FPS	29 FPS
high	20 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	13 FPS	13 FPS
1440p
low	23 FPS	28 FPS
medium	17 FPS	17 FPS
high	9 FPS	10 FPS
ultra	6 FPS	7 FPS
4K
low	10 FPS	15 FPS
medium	8 FPS	10 FPS
high	5 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	4 FPS	4 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 460 Open RadeonT 660M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 460	RadeonT 660M
1080p
low	80 FPS	84 FPS
medium	57 FPS	52 FPS
high	45 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	31 FPS	24 FPS
1440p
low	46 FPS	24 FPS
medium	30 FPS	17 FPS
high	20 FPS	12 FPS
ultra	16 FPS	9 FPS
4K
low	18 FPS	7 FPS
medium	12 FPS	5 FPS
high	9 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	6 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 460 Open RadeonT 660M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 460	RadeonT 660M
1080p
low	102 FPS	100 FPS
medium	82 FPS	80 FPS
high	68 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	50 FPS
1440p
low	77 FPS	75 FPS
medium	61 FPS	60 FPS
high	51 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	37 FPS
4K
low	51 FPS	50 FPS
medium	41 FPS	40 FPS
high	34 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	25 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 460 Open RadeonT 660M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 460	RadeonT 660M
1080p
low	102 FPS	100 FPS
medium	82 FPS	80 FPS
high	68 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	50 FPS
1440p
low	77 FPS	75 FPS
medium	61 FPS	60 FPS
high	51 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	37 FPS
4K
low	51 FPS	50 FPS
medium	41 FPS	40 FPS
high	34 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	25 FPS	25 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 460 Open RadeonT 660M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 460 and RadeonT 660M

GeForce GTX 460

The GeForce GTX 460 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,275 points. Launch price was $229.

RadeonT 660M

The RadeonT 660M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,221 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 460 scores 2,275 and the RadeonT 660M reaches 2,221 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 is built on Fermi while the RadeonT 660M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 460) vs 384 (RadeonT 660M). Raw compute: 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460) vs 1.459 TFLOPS (RadeonT 660M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	RadeonT 660M
G3D Mark Score	2,275+2%	2,221
Architecture	Fermi	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	336	384+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9072 TFLOPS	1.459 TFLOPS+61%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56+133%	24
L1 Cache	448 KB+250%	128 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 460 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RadeonT 660M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	RadeonT 660M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 460 comes with 768 MB of VRAM, while the RadeonT 660M has 2 GB. The RadeonT 660M offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 460) vs 2 MB (RadeonT 660M) — the RadeonT 660M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	RadeonT 660M
VRAM Capacity	0.75 GB	2 GB+167%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 460) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG (RadeonT 660M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	RadeonT 660M
Encoder	—	VCN 3.0
Decoder	—	VCN 3.0
Codecs	H.264	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 460 draws 160W versus the RadeonT 660M's 40W — a 120% difference. The RadeonT 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460) vs 350W (RadeonT 660M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.