RadeonT 660M vs FirePro V8800
RadeonT 660M
Popular choices:
FirePro V8800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RadeonT 660M is positioned at rank 226 and the FirePro V8800 is on rank 319, so the RadeonT 660M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RadeonT 660M
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V8800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RadeonT 660M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2010). The RadeonT 660M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro V8800 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro V8800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RadeonT 660M.
| Insight | RadeonT 660M | FirePro V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro V8800 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RadeonT 660M and FirePro V8800
RadeonT 660M
The RadeonT 660M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,221 points.
FirePro V8800
The FirePro V8800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,281 points. Launch price was $479.
Graphics Performance
The RadeonT 660M scores 2,221 and the FirePro V8800 reaches 2,281 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RadeonT 660M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the FirePro V8800 uses TeraScale 2, both on 6 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (RadeonT 660M) vs 800 (FirePro V8800). Raw compute: 1.459 TFLOPS (RadeonT 660M) vs 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro V8800).
| Feature | RadeonT 660M | FirePro V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,221 | 2,281+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.459 TFLOPS+32% | 1.104 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+60% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RadeonT 660M | FirePro V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RadeonT 660M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro V8800 has 4 GB. The FirePro V8800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RadeonT 660M) vs 0.25 MB (FirePro V8800) — the RadeonT 660M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RadeonT 660M | FirePro V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (RadeonT 660M) vs 11.2 (FirePro V8800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | RadeonT 660M | FirePro V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2)+7% | 11.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | None |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (RadeonT 660M) vs None (FirePro V8800). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG (RadeonT 660M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V8800).
| Feature | RadeonT 660M | FirePro V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | None |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | UVD 2.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The RadeonT 660M draws 40W versus the FirePro V8800's 74W — a 59.6% difference. The RadeonT 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RadeonT 660M) vs 350W (FirePro V8800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RadeonT 660M | FirePro V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-46% | 74W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.5+80% | 30.8 |
Value Analysis
The RadeonT 660M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2010).
| Feature | RadeonT 660M | FirePro V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $1499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $100 |
| Codename | Rembrandt+ | Juniper |
| Release | January 3 2023 | April 26 2010 |
| Ranking | #565 | #780 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RadeonT 660M and FirePro V8800
