RadeonT 660M vs GRID M60-1B
RadeonT 660M
Popular choices:
GRID M60-1B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RadeonT 660M is positioned at rank 226 and the GRID M60-1B is on rank 357, so the RadeonT 660M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RadeonT 660M
Performance Per Dollar GRID M60-1B
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RadeonT 660M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The RadeonT 660M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID M60-1B lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M60-1B is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RadeonT 660M.
| Insight | RadeonT 660M | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GRID M60-1B remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RadeonT 660M and GRID M60-1B
RadeonT 660M
The RadeonT 660M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,221 points.
GRID M60-1B
The GRID M60-1B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,256 points.
Graphics Performance
The RadeonT 660M scores 2,221 and the GRID M60-1B reaches 2,256 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RadeonT 660M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GRID M60-1B uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (RadeonT 660M) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-1B). Raw compute: 1.459 TFLOPS (RadeonT 660M) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-1B). Boost clocks: 1900 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | RadeonT 660M | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,221 | 2,256+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2048+433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.459 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+231% |
| Boost Clock | 1900 MHz+61% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 128+433% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 768 KB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RadeonT 660M | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | RadeonT 660M | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (RadeonT 660M) vs 12_1 (GRID M60-1B). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | RadeonT 660M | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The RadeonT 660M draws 40W versus the GRID M60-1B's 225W — a 139.6% difference. The RadeonT 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RadeonT 660M) vs 350W (GRID M60-1B). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RadeonT 660M | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-82% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 55.5+455% | 10.0 |
Value Analysis
The RadeonT 660M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | RadeonT 660M | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $120 |
| Codename | Rembrandt+ | GM204 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #565 | #525 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RadeonT 660M and GRID M60-1B
