
RadeonT 780M vs Radeon Pro W5500X

RadeonT 780M
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W5500X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RadeonT 780M is positioned at rank 142 and the Radeon Pro W5500X is on rank 124, so the Radeon Pro W5500X offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RadeonT 780M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro W5500X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro W5500X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RadeonT 780M.
| Insight | RadeonT 780M | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.6%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (4nm) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro W5500X remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RadeonT 780M and Radeon Pro W5500X

RadeonT 780M
The RadeonT 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,098 points.

Radeon Pro W5500X
The Radeon Pro W5500X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,351 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The RadeonT 780M scores 7,098 and the Radeon Pro W5500X reaches 7,351 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RadeonT 780M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon Pro W5500X uses RDNA 1.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 768 (RadeonT 780M) vs 1,536 (Radeon Pro W5500X). Raw compute: 8.909 TFLOPS (RadeonT 780M) vs 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500X). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1757 MHz.
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,098 | 7,351+4% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1536+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.909 TFLOPS+65% | 5.398 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+65% | 1757 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 96+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RadeonT 780M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5500X has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro W5500X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RadeonT 780M) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5500X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 5.
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 5+25% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (RadeonT 780M) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500X). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RadeonT 780M) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro W5500X).
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The RadeonT 780M draws 15W versus the Radeon Pro W5500X's 125W — a 157.1% difference. The RadeonT 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RadeonT 780M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro W5500X). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-88% | 125W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 473.2+705% | 58.8 |
Value Analysis
The RadeonT 780M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | RadeonT 780M | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $500 |
| Codename | Phoenix | Navi 14 |
| Release | January 31 2024 | December 11 2019 |
| Ranking | #359 | #345 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











